WHY ARE THE SIKHS (AND KHALSA) STATIC OR DECOMPOSING, WHILE THE OTHERS ARE DYNAMIC & INCREASING IN HINDUSTAN?
On hearing of conversion of thousands of Hindus to Buddhism in India (A SLAP IN THE FACE OF DECADENT HINDUISM, TO START WITH!) recently, my friend, a lady in the Baltic Republic of Estonia, asked me a question of which I seek the answer from the whole world.
She asked, "Why did they not embrace the SIKH Faith?"
The reason for her amazement is that due to a close study of the Sikhs and their history (of valour) and (resounding) victories, she came to regard the SIKHS (and their Faith) as No. 1 in the world- not only in Courage, Conviction, Commitment to Faith, and Community service.
Their SGPC, the premier Sikh body, is frozen in the mould of 17th century AD, and their top leader, 'Sardar' Partap Sigh Badal, Chief Minister of "Union Territory", seems to be the contemporary of Rasul Allah Mohammed rather than George Bush.
The "mouse" of a SIKH "Sardar" could not even move his seat of government to the TERRITORY of his own state. While going abroad, he does take off from, and land on, the New Delhi International Airport that has the irreplaceable name of Indira KHAN who imposed Emergency (1975) in order to give a 'bloody nose' to the Hindus, launched her Operation 'Blue State' in order to give a 'bloody nose' to the Sikhs, but had returned EAST Bengal (after capturing it in 1972!) to ISLAM so that the TERRITORY was not 'contaminated' by the third class secularism of her despicable HINDU serfs and slaves.
SO IT SEEMS to the whole world.
How does it seem to YOU?
For SECURITY, PEACE, PROSPERITY and STABILITY of PARTITONED India, it is absolutely vital that the Sikhs OUTNUMBER the Muslims.
But up to now, MUSLIM numbers have gone ON, and ON, and ON, by leaps and bounds, while the Sikh numbers are statis and the HINDU number decreasing.
Now spare a thought for this kind of HINDUSTAN that is about to "catch fire" all over once again.