THE PRIME MINISTER OF MUCH REDUCED MUTILATED & PARTITIONED INDIA (BROKEN BHARAT MINUS LAHORE AND CHITTAGONG!) IS A "MOHAMMEDAN", OR UNDER THE FOOT OF WHITE ELEPHANT FROM ITALY!
The land where MOHAMMED was born does NOT allow the construction of even the tiniest temple on earth. Yet his followers threaten the HINDUS in HINDUSTAN with a bloody devastating CIVIL WAR if they dream of reconstructing the LORD SRI RAM TEMPLE at the birthplace of Lord Rama.
How is THAT for Hindu "gaurav" across the globe? Please read the news item below to appreciate the BLOW to mind and spirit of the HINDUS which they are forced to accept and take LYING DOWN.
The HINDUS (the MAJORITY community in India) have been told in NO uncertain terms that India belongs to the Mohammedans who are the LORDS SUPREME in North Kashmir AND South Kashmir!
Not one MP or cabinet minister in the whole of India is raising the question, "What ought to be the constitutional status of MOHAMMEDANS in India AFTER Partition?"
Do we see a MAN among the one billion Hindus?
TRAGIC NEWS ITEM:
PM refuses VHP (Vishwa Hindu Parishad) land for Ayodhya temple
By Smita Gupta
(COURTESY) Times News Network
Times of India
Sunday, January 27, 2002
Indraprasth - The VHP appeared to be in a confrontation mode on Sunday after the Prime Minister made it clear that the government could not hand over the land surrounding the sanctum sanctorum in Ayodhya till the Ram Janambhoomi issue was resolved, preferably through a "national consensus".
Sources said the PM stressed he had never promised to find a solution before March 12, only that there should be a negotiated settlement in which the sants would have to be involved. Any solution would have to be within the Constitution, respect the rule of law, the NDA manifesto and the court verdict, he said.
However, he would ask the law ministry to examine "the legal and constitutional aspects" of handing over the land. But he said he was making no commitment on this.
For if even "something" could be done through an executive order or Parliament, his first preference was for a "national consensus". (SIC)
(NB: "NATIONAL CONSENSUS" in India means approval by the MOHAMMEDAN FIFTH COLUMN AND SONIA'S "SPIT" ON THE HINDU'S HEAD!)
Both he and defence minister George Fernandes told the VHP delegation, during a three-hour meeting, that the government was fighting terrorism and the Army was deployed along the border, and it was no time to start an agitation which could create a law and order problem. (sic)
(NB: When a Hindu lifts his toe, it becomes a serious LAW & ORDER PROBLEM in India!)
This clearly left the VHP leaders unhappy. They headed for a rally at the Ramlila grounds to give a call for ''Ayodhya chalo''. If the tone of the VHP leaders, who spoke to media persons after the meeting, was belligerent, the sub-text of the speeches at the rally -- among them VHP chief Ashok Singhal, Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas functionary Ramchandra Paramhans, Dalmia, Nrityagopaldas and Swami Mitranand -- was pretty much the same.
Stressing they had little faith in the government's ability to fulfill their demands, they all asserted that the construction of the Ram temple would begin on any suitable date after March 12, come what may, and that ''Rambhakts'' would begin to gather in Ayodhya from February 24.
After the meeting, Fernandes highlighted the fact that the government would examine the legal aspects of handing over the undisputed plots of land around the disputed site (sic**), acquired by the Centre in 1993 in Ayodhya, to the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas. But only Paramhans made a cursory mention of it in his speech. (The VHP's contention is that the land acquired by the Centre is without legal encumbrance, but the Babri Masjid Action Committee says the court has decreed that the government cannot hand over the land during the pendency of the title suit.)
(** NB: The unconditional surrender of Lahore and Sylhet in 1947 was not disputed, nor the RETURN AFTER CAPTURE of EAST Bengal to Islam in 1972.)
If Paramhans warned the PM that his predecessors who had failed to help in the construction of the temple had either died or lost office, Mitranand -- who had earlier warned the PM of a satyagaraha -- was harsher, saying he had no faith in the government and perhaps it was time to bring these politicians to a "sant paatshala" and "make murgas out of them" -- in short, discipline them.
Singhal struck a conciliatory note when he said he understood the PM was under pressure from his NDA partners -- the NDA meeting on Saturday had recommended that nothing be done till the court verdict. But he, too, stressed that their demand was perfectly reasonable; he also appealed to the sants to meet the PM once more in February. But the bottomline was that after March 12, there would be no talk, only action.
The strongest speech -- often descending to the abusive - - came from Acharya Dharmendra: He said Vajpayee was PM only because of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement; and told Advani, who had called December 6 "the most shameful day of his life" (NB: HIS RUN FROM KARACHI AS A REFUGEE IN 1947 WAS NOT SO SHAMEFUL! -owner web site), not to forget that it was the Ram rath yatra which had got him to the North Block. ''The day the VHP and the RSS decide, the politics of the country will change,'' he thundered.