Date: 4/6/2002


..................A SANE BRITISH VOICE:



“You need to look at the Koran. Don’t believe what the papers say about Islam being a peace-loving religion. We’ve had to live with it for hundreds of years, so we know. Believe me, Islam is the biggest threat Britain has ever faced. Read the Koran and you’ll find out what I mean.”

I put down the phone after a conversation with one of several very pro-British Hindus who has contacted the British National Party in recent weeks, and decided to take his advice. As soon as I’d got hold of a copy of the Koran, I started to find out for myself what is in the book which rules and guides the hearts and minds of the world’s half-a-billion Muslims.

I began by looking for the piece which has been quoted again and again since September 11th, including by George Bush, Tony Blair, Iain Duncan-Smith and an endless string of journalists: “Whoever kills a soul is like one who has killed the whole of Mankind.” This sentence is at the heart of the Politically Correct campaign to ensure that the war fever against Islamic terrorists doesn’t lead to an explosion of hostility against Muslims per se. After all, isn’t it clear evidence that Islam is at root a peaceful, loving religion; Christianity with a towel on its head?

Indeed it would be, if it were genuine. But the problem is that this quotation is a Politically Correct fabrication. Just look at what Surah 5. Ayat 32 actually says:

“… whoever kills a soul, not in retaliation for a soul or corruption in the land, is like one who has killed the whole of mankind; and whoever saves a live is like one who saves the lives of all mankind. Our messengers came to them with the clear proof; but afterwards many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.”

So, far from killing never being allowed, it is permitted under the law of “an eye for an eye” in the case of murder, or in the case of “corruption in the land.” Lest it be thought that this may only be a matter of concern for New Labour Paymaster Generals, the very next Ayat continues:

“Indeed, the punishment of those who fight Allah and His Messenger and go around corrupting the land is to be killed, crucified, have their hands and feet cut off on opposite sides, or to be banished from the land. That is a disgrace for them in this life, and in the life to come theirs will be a terrible punishment.”

Which makes it all too clear that while the Koran teaches its followers to respect the sanctity of life of other good Muslims, those who “fight Allah and his Messenger (i.e. Muhammad)” should be killed and mutilated or banished. Some 5,000 individuals in the World Trade Centre got Option Number One, many of them almost to the letter.

The most cursory reading of the Koran makes it clear that, to a good Muslim, the commissions and omissions of key Western governments – particularly the USA and the UK – and of the assorted usurers and exploiters of the poor in the World Trade Centre, do indeed qualify as anti-Allah and corrupting the land. The unfortunate cleaners and caterers seem to be written off as collateral damage.

But surely, says the Westerner reared on half-forgotten Christian ideas of forgiveness and chivalry towards non-combatants (Hiroshima and Dresden and a thousand other instances notwithstanding), Allah wouldn't condone the deaths of innocent civilians in such a Holy War? Well, here's Allah's view of collateral damage. As you'll see it's even broader and blunter than George Dubya's:

Surah 27, Ayat 48

And there were in the city nine individuals, who worked corruption in the land and did not set things right.....

50. They schemed a scheme and We schemed a scheme, while they were unaware.

51. See then what was the outcome of their scheming: We destroyed them together with all their people.

52. Their houses are in ruin, on account of their wrongdoing. There is a sign for a people who know.

53. And we delivered those who believed and were God-fearing.

The significance of Ayats 48, 50, 51 and 52 is plain to see. 53 needs a moment's more thought. It tells the devout Muslim that there can have been no innocent victims anyway (even those who professed to be Muslim but took their pay packets from the Great Satan), because Allah would have delivered them by making them late for work that day.

There are a couple of references to Unbelievers which advise toleration and state that an individual’s religious belief, or lack of it, is a personal matter between them and Allah. But these pluralist passages are heavily outnumbered by condemnation of Unbelievers typified by S.67.9

O Prophet, struggle with the unbelievers and the hypocrites, and deal harshly with them. Their refuge shall be Hell, and what an evil resort!

The thoroughly reasonable S.10.99 asks Muslims: Had your Lord willed, everyone on earth would have believed. Will you then compel people to become believers?

But only a few pages before, the same ‘Word of God’ exhorts the faithful to “fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them see how harsh you can be.” (s.9123). Small wonder that some Muslims make genuinely good neighbours, while others are from hell. And the problem is that the infernal passages outnumber the ecumenical ones. S.22 contains more classics:

19. To the unbelievers, garments of fire shall be cut up and over their heads boiling water shall be poured;

20. Whereby whatever is in their bellies and in their skins shall be melted.

21. And for them are iron rods (which, the helpful footnote in my edition explains, are “To beat their heads with.”

Nor is this vision of a riot in Bradford just a matter of damnation in the next world. The Koran also includes frequent exhortations to the Muslim Faithful to fight against the unbelievers in the here and now. Surah 9 provides some good examples:

38. O believers, what is the matter with you? If you are told: “March forth in the Way of Allah,” you cling heavily to the ground. Are you satisfied with the present life rather than the Hereafter….

39. If you do not march forth, He will inflict a very painful punishment on you…

41. Charge forth, on foot or mounted, and struggle with your possessions and yourselves in the Way of Allah.

Such passages reinforce the message of S.4.95:

Those of the believers who stay at home while suffering from no injury are not equal to those who fight for the Cause of Allah with their possessions and persons.

The message is reinforced time and time again. There’s S.9.29: Fight those among the People of the Book …. who do not profess the true religion (i.e. Jews and Christians), till they pay the poll-tax out of hand and submissively.

Or S.60.4:

You have had a good example in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people: “We are quit of you and what you worship apart from Allah. We disbelieve in you. Enmity and hatred have arisen between you and us forever, till you believe in Allah alone.”

Nor is it just a matter of ‘hatred’ in spirit. The Koran recommends it in the highly practical form of ethnic cleansing as well:

S.14.13 & 14 Then their Lord revealed to them: “We shall destroy the wrongdoers (who refused to accept Allah). And We will make you dwell in the land after them.

S.59.2 It is He Who drove out the unbelievers among the People of the Book (i.e. Jews and Christians) from their homes at the first mustering.

S.33.60 If the hypocrites, those in whose hearts is a sickness and those who spread lies in the city, do not desist, We will certainly urge you against them and then they will not dwell with you therein as neighbours but for a short time.

The same theme runs through parts of Surah 33, with the addition of a promise to faithful Muslims of more countries coming under their sway in the future:

27. And he bequeathed to you their lands, their homes and their possessions, together with land you have never trodden.

It’s quite likely that many members of the Muslim community, having come to regard non-Muslims as friends and to grow fond of their adopted country, may be inclined to shut all this bigoted nonsense out of their minds. But if they – or their often alienated children – read the Koran, they will find passage after passage warning them against taking unbelievers as friends and against the tolerance needed to keep the peace in a multiracial state:

S.2.216 You are enjoined to fight, though it is something you dislike ….217. Fighting (in the Holy Month) is a great sin; but to debar people from Allah’s sacred Way and to deny him and the sacred Mosque, and to drive people out of it is a greater sin in Allah’s sight. Sedition (idolatry and the corruption of Muslims) is worse than murder.

If those who interpret the Koran literally (as all good Muslims should, though many – fortunately for them and us alike – do not) were to start putting all this bloodthirsty advice into practice as soon as they first arrived in a new country, the natives would probably wake up and smell the burning coffee. But Allah is described repeatedly in His book as a “schemer,” and S.4.101 suggests His people are clearly entitled to follow His example in order to keep the opposition off their backs:

And when you journey in the land, you are not at fault if you shorten the prayer for fear that the unbelievers will harm you. The unbelievers are your manifest enemies.

But that advice is only applicable when the Muslims are too few to stand a chance of winning the fight which the Koran stresses is their religious duty. Once their numbers increase – and they don’t need to be in the majority if the other side isn’t keen on confrontation. S.8.65

O Prophet, urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast men among you, they will defeat two hundred; and if there are a hundred they will defeat a thousand of the unbelievers, because they are a people who do not understand.

Is this ten per cent rule just a forgotten verse in a dusty book? The answer may perhaps be seen in places like Burnley and Bradford.

The soft-hearted among our own people, those “who do not understand” what is going on, will no doubt object that ‘moderate’ Muslims tend to pick and choose to follow the few tolerant verses rather than obeying the overall aggressive and intolerant tone of the Koran. No doubt many do, but they are warned against such Western-style tolerance in no uncertain terms in S.2.85:

Do you, then, believe in one part of the Book and disbelieve in another? The reward of those among you who do that is nothing but disgrace in this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be turned over to the most severe punishment.

At a well-publicised meeting in Downing Street with self-appointed Muslim community leaders, Tony Blair claimed that “there is no contradiction between being a Muslim and being a British citizen.”

For the average Westernised Muslim who goes along with the family religion without giving it much thought this may well be the case. But for any good Muslim, who reads the Koran and accepts its claims to be the literal word of Allah, the situation is different. There are several points in the Koran in which Muslims are ordered not to obey unbelievers, and these are taken by fundamentalists to reject any form of government which is not a strict theocracy run exclusively by Muslim clerics. When such people reject rulers such as Saddam Hussein and Gadaffi as ‘unislamic’, what are the chances of them obeying the gang of Sodomites and crooks which calls itself ‘New Labour’?

S.3.149 O believers, if you obey the unbelievers, they will turn you upon your heels (“thus,” says the commentary, “turning you back from your true religion”)

S.25.52 So, do not obey the unbelievers and strive against them with it (the Koran) mightily.

Perhaps most pertinent of all under the present circumstances, when Britain is close to going to war against huge numbers of Muslims on the coat-tails of our American ‘allies’ is S9.73:

As to the unbelievers, they are friends of one another. If you do not this (that is, if you do not support the Muslims and subdue the unbelievers) there will be great sedition and corruption in the land.

None of this should be held against ordinary Muslims, many of whom are not much more ‘Muslim’ than Britain is ‘Christian.’ Any hostility directed to them can only drive them into the arms of the fundamentalists. But it should be held against our own ‘Great and Good’, the fools and knaves who decided to include a hefty dose of Islam in their witches’ brew of multiculturalism.

And an understanding of what the Koran really says – as opposed to what the serial liar Tony Blair tells us it says – should lead anyone with an ounce of commonsense to realise that a growing Muslim population is a recipe for communal strife and violence, particularly in a country where Political Correctness prevents the political Establishment from closing the gates to the immigration flood, taking steps to reverse the tide, and saying to a minority which sees expansion and domination as its religious duty : “Mend your ways and keep yourselves to yourselves – or get out!”


......COMMENT ON THE ABOVE BY A HINDU FROM PARTITIONED INDIA- partitioned because to the followers of MOHAMMED (Peace be upon his VICTIMS) ideals like Secularism, Democracy and Decency are like POISON, and therefore LAHORE could not be in the same country or province as AMRITSAR, just 50 km away.

In the human JUNGLE, there are the flesh eating carnivorous TIGERS and the grass eating vegetarian DEER. Killing humans who are not Mohammedan by Faith is taught by, or imbibed from, the teachings of KORAN and all the Maulvis and Mullahs at large across the globe. Avoiding violence AT ALL COSTS is taught to the Hindu and Sikh VICTIMS by their gurus, “sants”, and preachers.

Thus we had a situation in HINDUSTAN in previous centuries when the Arabs invaded Sindh without any provocation and then extended their BRUTAL and SAVAGE rule across the whole of India while imposing SHARIA’ Law upon the ENSLAVED Hindu nation.

The punishments meted out to the HINDU holy men and freedom fighters were as per KORAN! Just recall the manner of putting to death of RAJA DAHIR OF SIND, PRITHVI RAJ CHOHAN OF NEW DELHI, GURU ARJAN DEV, GURU TEGH BAHADUR, BANDA SINGH BAHADUR, BOY HAKIKAT RAI, and the two little sons of GURU GOBIND SINGH Ji.

DO FIND OUT about them and how or why they were KILLED. They were brutally KILLED as per 'teachings of Islam'. Whole civilisations were wiped out as per KORAN, and more recently, as per "MEIN KAMPF".

The Mohammedans enter a country by HOOK OR CROOK, through the front door yelling "ALLAH HU AKBAR", killing, destroying and setting fire to all that stands before them, including the statues carved out in the mountains, or enter an unwary secular and CIVILISED country through the backdoor like the MILLIONS of illegal immigrants and “asylum seekers” relentlessly pouring into Europe and North America at present from BANGLADESH, KOSOVA, ALBANIA, PALESTINE, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, IRAK, TURKEY, INDONESIA and the rest of the ISLAMIC world.

Being lewd, denied female company in their own ISLAMIC lands, they are quick to befriend the non Muslim females and commend Islam to them. Thus they reproduce more MOHAMMEDANS, legally now, and thus create a large block of sympathisers in the host populations.

Simply look at the loud and frenzied pro PLO demonstrations that are going on in the capitals like Washington, Paris, Beirut, Jakarta, and London. The protesters are all either MOHAMMEDAN or their friends through sexual seduction and intercourse with gullible, badly taught, vulnerable or forlorn native females. Not one of these non Muslim demonstrators understands what KORAN means to them, their peaceful societies and to their own civil liberties. Many a "JEMIMA GOLDSMITH" has gone off from Britain to voluntarily don the suffocating BURQA in Pakistan, Yemen, Iran, Libya, Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan and live their lives as per SHARIA Law.

But why are the PRO ISRAEL demonstrations so few? It is because the Mohammedans will mark the leaders and participants as a target and assassinate them, burn their shops, places of worship, or do them great harm later.

The Mohammedans are INTOLERANT. One can only recall the total lack of opposition to the creation of the OBSCENE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN on the soft soil of Hindu India. It was easily created due to the TERROR of Islam.

Till today NO Hindu leader dares provoke the MOHAMMEDANS, even in PARTITIONED INDIA, by declaring Pakistani State that was created without Referendum or Fight NULL AND VOID. It was a walkover by the Muslim BULLIES AND BAST**DS led by a MOHAMMED ALI JINN.

By now to many cowardly Hindus, it is “history”.

But look, PLO and the rest of the Islamic GANG across the globe do NOT regard the Partition of Palestine as “history”.

That is the difference between the carnivorous MOHAMMEDANS and the vegetarian HINDUS and the “nishkam sewak” Sikhs.

The COMMENT continues:

"At the outset I would like to say that the bold and true exposition of Islam in our midst, as outlined above, is an extremely valuable document, which is well researched and put together painstakingly. I am really impressed at its thoroughness.

"Such knowledge is great service in educating the British public. They have never been in the middle of such political and ideological hurricanes before. Turmoil and wars, bloodshed and feuds, seemed to be in distant lands. The reason for that was that the Muslims then were in distant lands, not at home!

"Now that Britain has got a heavy dose of Muslims, and all too suddenly, things are going to be different. Sporadic riots and disturbances in towns and cities are just the start.

"The Muslims have a powerful hidden agenda- to OVERWHELM the existing non-Muslim order.

"The British way of life that has survived for centuries is now under threat.

"Muslim leaders have advised their followers to seduce and marry non Muslim girls and produce children and increase numbers in order to take over the country through democracy.

"Of course when the situation is ripe or an opportunity offers itself, they will not wait to become a majority first.

"In India in 1947, one third of population was Muslim but seeing the majority community complacent, they attacked and occupied five provinces on one day. The Indians out of great embarrassment and shame over their worst ever defeat call it independence from the British, not defeat at the hands of the indigenous Muslims.

"Beastly practices like pouring boiling water over non Muslims, and chopping up the victim limb by limb and levying tax on non Muslims, as brought out by you in the file, were actually put into practice in India. A useful website is:


Though much of it relates to India and is irrelevant to us here, its archive section contains some good articles on the true nature of Islam. It is worth looking at in order to take out relevant material from it.


Why are the PRO ISRAEL demonstrations few and far between on the earth today? IT IS DUE TO TERROR OF ISLAM.

In PARTITIONED INDIA, where tens of millions of Hindus could have COME OUT to show solidarity with ISRAEL, there is NO pro Israeli demonstrations at all though the people can see it under attack by the same vicious ENEMY who REDUCED the territory of their own India by breaking her up into three ugly fragments on one day in 1947. Everyone in BROKEN BHARAT is terrified of ISLAM and MOHAMMED.

Even the SIKHS, once renowned warriors, dare not squeak, “Either Frontier Back To Khyber, or KHALISTAN!”

Such is the TERROR of the perennially LAND GRABBING/CHRISTIAN KILLING, ARMENIA/CYPRUS (land grabbing/HINDU killing, EAST BENGAL/NORTH KASHMIR, LAND GRABBING/SIKH KILLING, WEST PUNJAB, LAND GRABBING/BUDDHIST KILLER, AFGHANISTAN) wild and savage Mohammedan BEAST. It PARALYSES the brains of the Non Muslim victims. Not one wishes to REVOVER the lost territory of NORTH KASHMIR and then drive out the Mohammedans. None dares or cares to recall that when the MOHAMMEDAN "beasts and BAST**DS" invaded North Kashmir in October 1947, they WIPED OUT the entire non Muslim population there.

This view of Islam will be amended when the eternally disruptive PLO, who refuse to vanish in the vast Arab world around them, cry out for "AKHAND BHARAT", i.e., UNITED Secular India.