.............."WHAT'S WRONG WITH SHAH RUKH KHAN?
..........WHAT'S WRONG WITH ITALIAN BORN SONIA KHAN?
..........WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE MOSQUES IN BHARAT?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH ANY SUSHMA DEVI, RAJ KUMARI, LALITA AHMED OR SHARMILA TAGORE MARRYING A MOHAMMEDAN OR ANYBODY ELSE SHE LIKES?
WHAT'S WRONG WTIH THE PRESIDENT WHO IS A "BAHNGI" BY CASTE? DO YOU BELIEVE IN CASTE SYSTEM?
WHAT'S WRONG IN HAVING A RASHTRAPATI WHO IS A CHRISTIAN? INDIA IS SECULAR. ISN'T SHE?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH HIS WIFE FROM BURMA? ISN'T SHE A GOOD WIFE TO HIM? WHAT BUSINESS IS THAT OF YOURS?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LAHORE IN PAKISTAN WHEN SO MANY CITIES ARE IN BHARAT, TOO?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH HAVING AN ALBANIAN NUN IN CALCUTTA WHEN SHE IS DOING SUCH A WONDERFUL WORK THAT NO NATIVE WILL DO?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH HAVING A CHRISTIAN AS OUR DEFENCE MINISTER? ISN'T HE GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE JOB?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH GIVING EAST BENGAL BACK TO THE MUSLIMS? WAS IT GOOD TO HAVE SO MANY MUSLIM DEVILS JOIN WEST BENGAL IN 1972?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY DAUGHTER GOING OUT WITH A MOHAMMEDAN? ISN'T HE HUMAN?
WHAT'S WRONG IF I ACCEPT ISLAM TO SAVE MY LIFE? DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH EATING HALAL WHEN THE ANIMAL HAS TO BE KILLED ANY WAY?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH SAYING PRAYER IN ARABIC? DOESN'T ISHWAR UNDERSTAND EVERY LANGUAGE?" . . . . .
THUS GOES THE ENDLESS LIST OF THE COMPROMISING RECEDING, SURRENDERING, RUNNING HINDU WHOSE SAI BABA TOLD HIM, "PARMATMA IS IN EVERY FORM AND SHAPE. ISHWAR, ALLAH AND BHAGWAN ARE ONE."
THUS THIS "CUCKOO" CALLED SITA RAM KESRI DOES NOT SEE ANY DIFFERENCE IN FOLLOWING ANY RELIGION IF A SWORD Is PUT ON HIS NECK.
ONE CAN SEE THE REASON FOR THIS KIND OF DEFEATIST THINKING. WHEREVER THERE IS A NEED TO ASSERT, STAND FAST, DEFEND OR DEFY, THE HINDU BOLTS. HE VANISHES. HE IS NOWHERE TO BE SEEN.
In this climate of COLLAPSE, to see a KHAN playing love scenes with a HINDU girl does not seem vulgar. The native coolies went to movies for their entertainment.
"We have spent five rupees on the ticket and we are here for the fun. To us it does not matter whether the actor is a Musalman or a Hindu. We are secular, not communal."
But this scenario is extremely hurtful to some honourable HINDUS who wish to know, "Why the HELL can't Shah Rukh KHAN embrace Hinduism, if he is making millions at their cost?"
Why does he not have the decency to understand that a HINDU actor playing similar love scenes with a Muslim actress will be promptly ASSASSINATED by his fellow Muslims?
And how hurtful to know that NO Hindu actor dare touch a Musalmani in any INDIAN movie while any son of a Mohammed can do what he likes with a Hindu maiden.
At partition every Hindu actor and actress in the film studios in LAHORE, which rivalled those in Bombay in those days, was either KILLED or EXPELLED.
Great names like PRITHVI RAJ disappeared overnight and went on to take refuge in Bombay. But in Bombay all the MUSLIMS stayed on.
It is a point of HONOUR and DINGITY, and SELF-ESTEEM, of a nation. And if these qualities are non existent or not understood, then WHOSE job is it to impart these, AND PATRIOTISM, to the citizens?
So it is extremely HURTFUL to any decent Hindu to read in "The Times", London, dated May 16, 2002, page 3,
"Bollywood's expansion into mainstream cinema will be boosted by the decision to show one of its epic films at the Cannes Film festival . . . .
"Devdas", a tragic love story, is the first to be selected by the festival.
"Devdas", which runs for almost three hours has been made with a mainstream audience in mind. Its director, Sanjay Leela Bansali, describes it as a cross between "Shakespeare in Love" and "Moulin Rouge", a film that dipped into music from Bollywod films.
. . . . .The film features some of the biggest names in Indian cinema, Shahrukh Khan (sic), who is said to woo audiences with his "smouldering eyes". Madhuri Dixit, a specialist in classical dance, and Aishwarya Rai, who was crowned Miss World in 1994." . . . .
All the Hindus should be ASHAMED that the biggest name in Indian movies is a MOHAMMEDAN, not a Hindu. It is just like the top man.
The TOP man among one billion midgets is a CHRISTIAN and a "BHANGI", too. He is the PRESIDENT!
Why can't India produce a single HINDU actor to match the manliness and acting of Shah Rukh KHAN?
If the Mohammedans of India can set FIRE to any cinema that shows a film in which a Hindu actor is seen too near a Muslim actress, then why can't the Hindu "eunuchs" simply follow the path of "BAPU'S" Satyagraha by boycotting the movie in which a KHAN appears, especially as a "Dev Das" (Servant of Lord Deva)? The most appropriate name for a MOHAMMEDAN Khan would have been ALIDAS OR FATIMADAS (Servant of Fatima).
We do not expect the HINDUS OF HINDUSTAN to be superior to, or better than, any Mohammedan. We merely ask them to be EQUAL.
They can be equal ONLY if we see at least one Hindu actor making half the love that these KHANS make to HINDU maidens on our cinema screens.
For "dogs" of this world neither "religion" matters nor any KHAN on top of a Hindu maiden. But to the MEN and STALWARTS of this world who cut and chopped Hindustan, any Hindu maiden is a "game" and "fun".
And the Hindus have to KNOW whan the fun stops and OUR DEGRADATION BEGINS.
On seeing this film, one cries out, "Manly KHAN, virile MUSALMAN, and a conqueror MOHAMMEDAN, Hindu maiden, and the emaciated demoralised receding Hindu world of "cows" and PARTITION."
When will our people demand that any KHAN will embrace Hinduism first before touching a Hindu devi on the Bollywood film set.
And our HINDU "devis", too, seeing their "EUNUCH" fathers and grandfathers, degraded uncles and rotten brothers and third class cowardly nephews all round, ought to behave better than any PROSTITITE in the gutters of Rome.
They, too, can muster guts to address a KHAN, looking straight into the rascal's eyes, "The religion of MY HINDU MOTHER is not so rotten THIRD CLASS that you will NOT touch!
"Come on, SHAH RUKH KHAN, shed your alien Islamic "LEPROSY" and ENNOBLE YOURSELF!
"KHAN is a word of abuse in PARTITIONED India of our ancestors."
.................THAT WILL BE THE DAY.
That will be the day when the Sikhs of Amritsar and the Rajputs of Bikaner and the MARATHAS of Mumbai and the Tamils of Chennai will look decent and manly to the NRI'S living in all nooks and corners of the world.