THE "MORALLY SUPERIOR" BUT DAMN COWARDLY HINDU ROSE TO DEFEND HIS ABDUL KALAM, THE ETERNALLY BEIMAN MUSALMAN.
AND THE MUSALMAN WILL REMAIN A BEIMAN SO LONG AS EAST BENGAL REMAINS OUT OF HINDUSTAN.
Response by the List Moderator, to the posting on Abdul Kalam, who is being defended by the Hindus more than anyone else on earth:
"We have NO place for such anti Abdul Kalam comments and we delete your ID from our discussion List."
RASHTRA 1947 sent response but it came back with the comment:
We are unable to deliver the message from <Rashtra1947@aol.com> to <email@example.com>.
The email address used to send your message is not subscribed to this group. If you are a member of this group, please be aware that you may only send messages to this group using the email address(es) you have registered with Yahoo! Groups. Yahoo! Groups allows you to send messages using the email address you originally used to register, or an alternate email address you specify in your personal settings.
SO HERE IS THE RESPONSE THAT CANNOT NOW BE POSTED BACK ON THAT "COWARDLY HINDU" LIST:
I have read the comment from an "UNKNOWN SENDER" to whom I cannot even reply.
But he has put his view on the List and I think the List is entitled to hear the OTHER VIEW, too, not just one that is "approved by Italy and Islam", or as per Hindu religion.
My critics see India as AKHAND, while I see it as BROKEN. That is the reason my views are not welcome.
If the nation is brainwashed, it needs to be EDUCATED. It the nation is weak, it needs to be STRENGTHENED. if the nation is broken and divided, it needs to be UNITED.
The world cares two hoots for the Hindu philosophy and spirituality and not even tuppence for Guru Nanak. Otherwise Lahore would be secular and Nankana Sahib would be in India.
Nor does the world give a damn to the Hindu plight in South Kashmir or our sentiments over Ayodhya. But, of course, Arabia is exonerated if she does not allow a tiny mandir to be built there while these Arabs are building and financing hundreds of mosques in Partitioned india.
Is that a recipe for survival of Hinduism?
Now just consider KASHMIR.
The only way to retain Kashmir in India is for India to enact an ISLAMIC Constitution, or subject all her male population to circumcision, i.e., convert to Islam en masse.
Then militancy will cease overnight and even North Kashmir will beg to join.
We should have seen the whole history of Hindustan to conclude that our spirituality, divinity and morality simply INVITE invasions, intrusions, attacks, defeats and massacres, not only destruction of sacred statues and holy mandirs.
MK Gandhi had all the scriptures on his side but he PERISHED most ignominiously in failing to defend his Akhand Bharat. The Hindu needed something else while putting his moralitiy and divinity under lock and key.
So, what good is such spirituality and divinity that my critic has quoted to justify his "licking" Abdul Kalam, a Musalman-eternally BEIMAN?
The List can remove my ID but NONE can remove the SHAME of India that lies broken, raped and bleeding, and minus North Kashmir, with NO Hindu in South Kashmir. They need SAFETY of their daughters there, not the morality quoted by my "misguided" friend.
To this "demolished" Hindu I would say, "KEEP YOUR MUSLIM PRESIDENT WHO WILL NOT TOUCH YOUR HINDUISM EVEN WITH A BARGE POLE. Try commending the NATIVE religion of Bharat to Abdul Kalam, quoting all the Shastras, Avataras and Gurus."
India was a dirty linen under BANDIT Nehru's foot. She is now a concubine of Abdul Kalam.
A MUSLIM President of PARTITIONED India is an insult to the ONE MILLION HINDUS SLAUGHTERED AT PARTITION WHEN THE MUSLIMS TOOK OUT FIVE PROVINCES leaving defeated and reduced India to keep her Secularism.
For secularism to be decent and acceptable in Delhi, it has to be RAMMED DOWN THE THROATS OF ALL THE ABDUL KALAMS LIVING IN LAHORE AND EAST BENGAL.
(End of Response).