THE HAPPY HINDU SETTLEMENT OF BALI WAS DEVASTED LIKE THE LANDSCAPE OF NORTH KASHMIR.
PARTITIONED INDIA'S "DONKEY" PRESIDENT AND "RASCAL" SUPREME COMMANDER IS A MOHAMMEDAN. YES, A MOHAMMEDAN WHO OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN EXPELLED TO PAKISTAN IN 1947 AS PER "TREATY OF PARTITIOIN".
CAN WE EXPECT OF THIS ABDUL KALAM FELLOW TO PROTECT THE HINDUS EVEN IN BHARAT?
"WE WILL WIPE OUT THE HINDUS FROM THE SURFACE OF EARTH, ONE BY ONE, HERE AND THERE, NOW AND THEN." WHO SAID THIS?
..............ABDUL KALAM TO GENERAL MUSHARRAF?
....................SONIA KHAN TO THE POPE?
.............BANDIT NEHRU'S GHOST TO GOD ALMIGHTY?
When Hindus are killed then it is secularism
The proximate cause of the ensuing riots in Gujarat, according to the ‘intelligentsia’ is the alleged nature of the so called Hindu nationalists, a term that is, in passing, an oxymoron: the fundamentalists of Hinduism are tolerance and plurality, so a "Hindu fundamentalist’ is a contradiction in terms.
The impression amongst Hindus is that when Hindus are killed then it is secularism, When Hindus retaliate then it is communalism.
Several people often suggest from time to time suggest that they are ashamed to be Hindu or ashamed to be Bharatiya / Indian. This is ridiculous. If you are ashamed to be a Hindu because of what happened in Godhra and Gujarat, then you are not a Hindu to begin with. For otherwise you would be sharing the pain of Hindu pilgrims being burnt alive. Do not blame the religion for your own frailty, lack of self-confidence. In contrast, not a single Muslim (including famous bleeding heart Shabana Azmi) said he / she was ashamed to be a Muslim of 9/11 or Godhra incidents. All they said was that the attacks were un-Islamic. Okay, so Gujarat’s riots were un-Hindu, the rioters are not Hindus, thank you very much; we can all rest the Godhra backlash now.
Those who are ‘ashamed to be Hindu’ should consider formally converted to the religion of their choice, be it Marxism, Christianity or Islam. Those who are ‘ashamed to be Indian’ should consider emigrating. Really, nobody made you India’s ambassador or anointed representative of Hindus or Bharat; you should feel free to seek citizenship of Saudi Arabia, America, China, Pakistan, or Bangladesh for instance.
Pro-Pak. Muslims can leave: Thackeray
(WRONG, YOU CONCEDING, COMPROMISING, SURRENDERING MR. THACKERAY, YOU ARE TERRIBLY WRONG! ALL MOHAMMEDANS MUST BE EXPELLED.
.....PAKISTAN WAS NOT CONCEDED TO ONE HERE AND ONE THERE!)
MUMBAI Oct. 15, 2002. The Shiv Sena chief, Bal Thackeray, has asked Hindus to start calling Bharat "Hindu Rashtra'' for which "you need no one's permission.'' Only, "our religion is to be honoured here'' and then "we will look after other religions.''
At a well-attended annual Dassera public meeting, Mr. Thackeray said that if Muslims had respect only for the Pakistani flag, then "they can leave this country.'' In the United Kingdom, they were told that the host country's laws had to be honoured.
He spoke of his willingness to "wipe out'' trouble-making Muslims. What was needed, he said, was tackling militants, such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba, who kept coming in and others who worked under the cover and assistance of the Pakistani ISI. First, "kick the four crore Bangladeshi Muslims out'' and then the country would be secure.
`Hindus should form suicide squads'
Earlier in his party's mouth piece, Saamana, Mr. Thackeray said terrorism could best be countered only if Hindus also had suicide squads "like them''. People had to conduct themselves "like men.'' A country of a billion people, he said, in his front-page message, should not be helpless. So, instead of waiting for someone else to do something for us, "are we going to do something by ourselves or not'' he asked? ``They'' have suicide squads but "do we have suicide squads of Hindus''. If such squads existed, then the headstrong terrorists could be taken head-on, Mr. Thackaray said.
B.K. Nehru, a distinguished bureaucrat met Chaudhari Mohammed Ali, then the first Cabinet Secretary of Pakistan, for financial settlement of military assets after partition. Even after creation of Pakistan, The Dawn, which was the mouthpiece of the Muslim League, continued to abuse Bharat and Hindus without rhyme or reason "in the most vituperative language." B.K. Nehru asked Mohammed Ali why he was doing this as he (Ali) knew the charges were false; nothing of the kind was happening in Bharat. Mohammed Ali’s answer was simple and straight forward: an enemy was necessary to build the new nation of Pakistan There was nothing to bind them together except religion. They needed an external enemy. The Hindus and Bharat provided a ready made one.
B.K. Nehru then asked how long they would need this external enemy. Ali said "five years". B.K. Nehru posed another pertinent question "Did Pakistan ever think what would happen if Hindus also floated the theory "Hinduism is in danger?" The reply of Ali was significant. He said: "I am not afraid of that. Because your religion is incapable of fanaticism."
If Pakistan has to be understood this mindset cannot be ignored. Their "compulsive hostility" towards Bharat is apolitical necessity and Pakistan knows the high tolerance level of Hinduism. This explains why the ISI and its jehadi outfits keep hitting Bharatiya targets including the Bharatiya parliament on 13 December 2001 without similar response from Bharat. But the backlash of Godhra incident has been massive, the like of which was never seen before. It seems that Hindu psyche is now changing from tolerance to retaliation There are several reasons for it. The Hindu psyche is being influenced by happenings in the Indian sub-continent. This is a reality. Bharat is sandwiched between two Islamic States, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Hindus discovered to their dismay in independent Bharat that they were becoming gradually cornered in their own and only Homeland by diabolical machinations of interested parties, and many of their own leaders, vaunting themselves with so-called secular and intellectual credential, were helping this process.
Naturally, the question that began to haunt many Hindu minds was: do secularism and democracy permit discrimination between class and community? Does secularism militate against a uniform civil code for all citizens? Does it give unlimited privilege to those secular zealots to hurt the religious sentiments and belief of only the Hindus?
Tolerance and Pseudo-Secularist are Dirty words. Hindus have fooled themselves by their indiscriminate use and some even take pride in that. These words have been used to imprison the minds of Hindus by interested parties.
"We refuse to live in Fear" Bush has said. Hindus are living under the fear of Muslim terror, but Bharatiya government is not doing anything in this direction.
"Iraqi president Saddam Hussein is a murderous tyrant" who must be stopped now before he blackmailed the world with nuclear weapons, U S president has bowed. Next door Pakistan is blackmailing Bharat with its nuclear weapons but Bharat is not doing anything to neutralize the threat and terror from Pakistan.
At one time there was a demand for formation of an Urdu State like Mopalistan in western Utter Pradesh by dividing the present Utter Pradesh State. For this purpose, Dr. Fridi made a party called "Muslim Majlis", on which ticket he was elected to UP assembly. He claimed a state of the area from Saharanpur to Lucknow on the basis that Urdu is not only the language of Muslims only, but Hindus of these areas also speak Urdu. He said in the U.P. assembly that if we Muslims did not get Urdu State easily, then we would get Urdu State on the strength of sword and riots. The sword mentality is always prevalent in Muslims always. ISI always give encouragement to such Muslim mentality and thoughts. The areas, which are demanded to be included in Urdu State, are riot prone areas. In cities like Rampur, Muradabad, Aligarh, Merrut, Mujaffarnagar, many arms, transmitters have been recovered from Muslim houses, Masjids, Madrasas, and graveyards.
Imam of Jama masjid of Delhi, Abdullaha Bukhari has said that Muslims cannot be loyal to Bharat. If Urdu State is ever formed, then it could be a den of ISI, which would virtually become a mini Pakistan. Therefore it is essential that Hindus should stop speaking Urdu language and media people should also discard the use of Urdu words from Hindi and other Bhartiya languages.
Bharatiya Media is not only promoting Urdu language, but are also promoting English language. Bharat is the third country in the world after United States and U.K. where English books are published and sold. The growth of English in Bharat is at the cost of Sanskrit, Hindi and other Bharatiya languages. The growth of English language also shows that Hindus are still mentally slave people and Bharat does not deserve to be an independent nation. As long as media people keep promoting Urdu and English languages in Bharat, till then other Bhartiya languages would not prosper in Bharat. For the sorry state of Sanskrit, Hindi, and other Bharatiya languages, media people are responsible to a very great extent.
The phrase "weapons of mass destruction" seems to be on the lips of everybody these days. As far as Bharat and Hindus are concerned, it should refer to (1) the exploding population of Muslims, (2) religious conversions, and (3) pseudo-secularism of Indian intellectuals.
The Bharatiya media who promote Urdu words in Hindi do not realize that they are not only destroying Hindi and other Bharatiya languages, but they are in fact encouraging Muslim fundamentalist. One day on the basis of the Muslim claim that Hindus speak Urdu language, they can claim the further partition of Bharat.
The role of media in Bharat, it seems, is to promote anti-national, anti-secular, anti-Hindu, anti-Bharat and disruptive forces and to destroy Hindi, Sanskrit and other Bhartiya languages by use of Urdu and English words in Hindi and Bharatiya languages and also to promote the use of Urdu and English languages by various other means. Also to create environment for further division of Bharat to satisfy the ever increasing demands of Muslims and Christians
A true Bhartiya should have thrown English out of Bharat and have promoted Sanskrit and Hindi by its all round use, like giving cast of Hindi films and TV programmes in Hindi, using Hindi in a prominent manner on the labels of the products manufactured and sold in Bharat, teaching Sanskrit and Hindi in all Schools, colleges and Universities, using correct Hindi in media instead of using filth in Hindi, publishing flyers and leaflets in Hindi, devoting 90 – 95 percent broadcasting time to Hindi and Sanskrit and closing down most of the English publications in Bharat.
The media and the pseudo seculars are waging one kind of war against Indians. The Islamic Jihadi terrorists and Missionaries are waging another kind of war against Indians. The Macaulytes and the Marxists are further complicating this scenario.
--When will Indians and PIOs wake up to realise the realities?
--When will Tamilians rise above petty politics and realise the dangers that are growing in TN ?
--The Mumbai + Coimbatore bomb blasts should have been a reminder. The media still plays it down, much to the horror of many.
--The western media, for all its shortcomings, plays its tunes to the interests of their nations and their governments first and foremost.
--When will Bharat /India wake up to realities?
--What will force Bharatiyas / Indians to wake up to realities? Never before, in a nation as large as India, have the lives of so many (been) ignored and uncared for, by so few. This lack of awareness is a much bigger tragedy - for the inability of the human mind to realise the dangers is far worse than anything.
The first step is to realise the dangers.
The second step would be to mobilize minds, soldiers and ammunition against these enemy forces.
The third step is to wage the war and defeat the enemy.
Why is that Hindus and Bharatiyas / Indians are failing?
A war is half won, when the mindsets are won over.
THOSE DAMN FOOLS WHO CALLED THE MUSLIMS "BHAI BHAI", THOSE IGNORANT AND THE STUPID, WHO TRUSTED THE MUSLIM MINORITY IN THEIR PEACEFUL AND PROSPEROUS COUNTRY, SAW THEM GROW AND EXPAND AND BECOME POWERFUL, TOO POWERFUL. IN THE END THOSE WHO TRUSTED THE MUSLIMS PERISHED.