ASYLUM: COMPARE THE RICH SIKHS, THE RICHER JEWS, AND THE POOREST MOHAMMEDANS

Date: 1/19/2003

Comment

..............ASYLUM AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

THE PERSECUTED SIKHS WHO CAME, WERE ALL RICH AND WEALTHY. THE PERSECUTED JEWS WHO CAME WERE EVEN RICHER AND WEALTHIER.

BUT THE MOHAMMEDANS, ARRIVING BY AIR, LAND AND SEA, WHO ARE FLOODING AND SWAMPING EUROPE, ARE FLEEING THEIR OWN ISLAMIC REPUBLICS. THEY ARE ALSO THE POOREST, THE MOST ILLITERATE AND THE MOST IMPOVERISHED OF THE LOT.

WHILE THE SIKH AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION HAS STOPPED, THE MUSLIM GATE CRASHING WILL INCREASE, ULTIMATELY TAKING US ALL DOWN TOWARDS THE STATE OF AFGHANISTAN IN 1998 AND ARABIA IN 720 AD.

UNLIKE THE HARD WORKING, LAW ABIDING AND MORALLY UPRIGHT SIKHS AND THE PEACE LOVING PROGRESSIVE JEWS, THE MUSLIMS ARE INTO VIOLENCE, DRUGS AND SABOTAGE, AND MANY ARE PLANNING ACTS OF TERRORISM.

...................===============

MR. DIMBLEDY HOSTED A DISCUSSION ON TERRORISM AND ILLEGAL ASYLUM SEEKERS IN THE EU.

Dear Mr Dimbleby.

While today's discussion was on ISLAMIC TERRORISM, two speakers, one through ignorance, the other obviously through mischief, mentioned the two most loyal communities in Britain today, the SIKHS and the JEWS.

It showed their ingnorance of the circumstances of their arrival in this country.

To start with, the Muslims come here with the dream of REPLACING CROWN by KORAN, by killing the innocent people and destroying public property. The Sikhs are the DEFENDERS OF CROWN and TERRITORY.

Secondly, the British, before leaving in 1947, gave ONE THIRD OF INDIA'S TERRITORY to the indigenous Muslims while breaking the backbone of the Sikh community.

Thirdly the speaker should have known that the Sikhs mostly come from EAST PUNJAB.

While the British gave EAST BENGAL to the Muslims, they denied even Lahore and Nankana Sahib to India where the Sikhs sought refuge and safety after their ethnic cleansing at the hands of the Muslims-turned beasts in WEST PUNJAB.

Lastly, the Sikhs are among the most loyal citizens of this country. Can anyone say that of the MUSLIMS?

So the gentleman had to compare likes with likes. The Sikhs do not have forty two Sikh republics on earth like the Muslims. So they are at a disadvantage.

Another speaker mentioned the JEWS fleeng NAZI Germany. For his information the Nazis did not share the RELIGION, background and core loyalties of the Jews whereas the Muslims coming into this country are ALL fleeing the lands where the RULERS are also Mohammedan, pray in Arabic and share the same Koran and the Prophet.

In 1938 the Jews of Germany had NO Jewish State on earth. Similarly the Sikhs escaping repression and persecution in India under a MUSLIM President, have NO state of their own.

The Muslims are here to stay with the hidden agenda to convert this country to ISALM while the Sikhs are waiting to return to their home ground when it is called KHALISTAN.

In contrast to the Muslims, the Sikhs have a lot of SELF RESPECT, DIGNITY AND SELF-ESTEEM and will never stay anywhere as unwanted guests. In 1947, when slaughtered by the Muslims in their HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS, nearly FIVE MILLION Sikhs became uprooted and arrived in India as refugees. Did the world ever hear of a Sikh refugee? In contrast the Muslims, once displaced, remain REFUGEES for ever, to be fed, housed and clothed by the rest of the world.

.....................000000000

[_private/ftarc.htm]