CHALLENGE FOR ANY HAJJI ABDUL KALAM AND TWO MILLION MORE SEPARATIST "DEVILS" GATHERED AT MECCA TODAY.
....NOT ONE HINDU, SIKH OR CHRISTIAN IS IN MECCA TODAY.
THINK OF TAKING ALL THE MOHAMMEDAN ASYLUM SEEKERS BACK FROM EUROPE, AUSTRALIA, CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES?
WILL THEY COMMEND SECULARISM TO BOGUSDESH AND PAKISTAN THAT WERE CREATED ON THE SACRED SOIL OF INDIA BY TREASON, BULLYING AND BULLSHIT?
During World War 2, we knew where the asylum seekers were coming from and how long they would stay here.
As soon as they reached these shores, they FORSOOK their NAZI Party ideology and loyalty. If fact, they would have strangled Hitler had they got hold of him
With the end of that WAR, the stream of refugees dried up completely. Those who stayed on in Britain, assimilated or integrated nicely. They were not separatist or disruptive nor boast of their "fastest growing ideology."
Furthermore, they ware all Europeans, not Turks, Algerians, Bangladeshis, Sri Lankans, Afghans, Pakistanis and so on, a social prospect of human cauldron that gives unease to many who have seen the dilution and disintegration of national solidarity like this before.
Now most of these people are coming from ISLAMIC countries. On arrival here, they do not shed Islam nor drop the name "Mohammed." On the contrary "Mohammeds" are increasing in geometrical progression. Is someone keeping a record? Is it Top Secret?
On settling down they can marry more than one local girl, CONVERT THEM ALL, without exception, to Islam, and then the children also grow up as Muslims. The children of earlier refugees did not become Nazis nor continued to pray in German.
Now these people come from countries under proper ISLAMIC governments, established under laws of Koran and by popular mandate. Not one of them has been indicted by UNO for bad administration. They should, therefore, be returned to their lands of birth, which cannot be Hell for the Muslims.
But they will not voluntarily go back, not even to Bosnia, Albania, Afghanistan or Pakistan.
All government offices, NGO's and other voluntary agencies desperately want to look busy, to be doing something. They only look at the asylum seekers over here that is easy thing to do and also gives them media exposure.
None cares to find out whether back home they were starving, unemployed, Islamic fundamentalists or criminals, waiting for trial.
It is a fact that after World War 2, Germany bounced back to PROSPERITY. Which Islamic republic will bounce back to prosperity? I believe NONE. Since I saw the birth of Pakistan, I can quote a Pakistani about to be deported. He cried, "Don't send back to Hell." This was his verdict on ALL the Islamic republics. Is there not a challenge for the UNO, the Western governments and all the NGO's and voluntary organisations, to look beyond these shores?
The result is that more and more will keep on coming from the ISLAMIC republics. Without proper education, alienated from home cultures, and deprived of proper family connections, they will be involved with crime, drugs and sex.
Before they leave lands of birth and during the long trek to Britain, they are taught the ticks of how to ask for asylum, now to insist on it, all the useful numbers of welfare organisations and the human rights organisations they should contact for help and publicity.
Most of them are simply taking unfair and undue advantage of the welfare on offer here. We ought to realise that the prosperity of Europe came about due to Christian ethos, spirit and belief. At the same time we see a general collapse of Islamic republics. As more and more are fleeing the latter, the more will the former sink into turmoil and poverty. The choice is ours but it will not be so for long. While accepting the trickle that is meant to stay and strike roots, we will also have to take in the flood eventually.
Will they go back? On the contrary as we see the number of mosques and Islamic institutions that are going up there is increasing pressure on housing, schools and health facilities.
Since their ISLAMIC civilisation is separatist and disruptive in nature, it leads to social tensions and final turmoil. Muslim asylum seekers should be sent to ISLAMIC republics where they can be housed and fed in appropriate context.
They should be called upon to show some solidarity among themselves, a sense of shame or honour, and should be asked to take them all back. In plain words, they are the dirty or surplus wash from the world of Islam and that is where they belong. They should be sent back after some education to improve their Islamic republics so that their own worlds stop oozing out, or expelling, the surplus.
UNO could also intercede with the tyrant governments. Europe and America cannot take these corrupt and rotten rulers to task. They will be accused of interfering in the INTERNAL affairs of the Islamic world.
There is no dearth of money with many ISLAMIC republics who will nOT spare a dime for any non Muslim orphan or widow.
United Nations ought to take over the issue of asylum seekers since they are now a GLOBAL misfortune. They ought to arrange to send the MUSLIM asylum seekers to one or the other ISLAMIC republic. It need not be beyond our wits to do something to remove the offensive title of ISLAMIC in any republic. We need to think of the NON Muslims there. The Muslims will NOT do that.
If UNO do not act, the flood of asylum seekers, mostly MUSLIM, will only increase and strain community relations further in Europe.
Should we not expect their own ISLAMIC countries to feed, house and give medical aid to them in their own countries?
We would like to throw a challenge to the great gathering of the TWO MILLION MUSLIMS gathered in Mecca for Hajj today,
"Take all the Muslim asylum seekers in Europe and America BACK. Think of their misery and you own Islamic image in the world."
The fine nation of HINDUS in Hindustan is so DEMORALISED AND RUINED by the tyranny of ISLAM through CENTURIES, that they all, one billion of them, openly concede that there is NONE better than ABDUL KALAM, A PAKISTANI BY TERMS OF THE ACT OF PARTITION OF INDIA, 1947, for the post of PRESIDENT of their SECULAR republic.
ABDUL KALAM, A DEVIOUS MOHAMMEDAN, IS BELIEVED TO BE A "SECULAR GOAT" BY THE HINDUS JUST AS THEY ONCE REGARDED MOHAMMED ALI JINNAH, THE FOUNDER OF PAKISTAN, WHILE HE WAS THE PRESIDENT OF ALL-INDIA CONGRESS PARTY BEFORE PARTITION.