Date: 1/6/2004
NONE HAS DONE MORE HARM TO HINDUSTHAN, BOTH BY SURRENDERING HER TERRITORY TO THE ENEMY, AND BY BRAINWASHING THE NATION WITH REGARD TO THE NATURE OF THAT ENEMY THAN PANDIT NEHRU, "MAHATMA" MK GANDHI AND THEIR CONGRESS PARTY.
IT IS TIME THAT THEIR STATUES ACROSS INDIA ARE DESTROYED AND FOUNDATIONS NAMED AFTER THESE CRIMINALS BE RE-NAMED OR THEIR FUNDS CONFISCATED. THE NAME "NEHRU" OUGHT TO BE EXTINCT IN PARTITIONED INDIA JUST AS THE NAME "HITLER" IS IN GERMANY.
THE INDIANS NEED TO SEE THEMSELVES AS HONOURABLE PEOPLE WITH SOME DIGNITY AND NOT EVER WILLING TO LICK THE FOOT OF ANY ABDUL KALAM, BOFORS CHOR, AND SONIA KHAN.
BEFORE THE CREATION OF PAKISTAN, INDIA'S HINDU LEADERS SHOWED NO GUTS, SPIRIT OR SENSE OF PATRIOTISM AND THE SIKH LEADERSHIP SHOWED NO WISDOM OR FORESIGHT WHATSOEVER, TO THWART OR REPEL THAT ATTACK ON THE INTEGRITY OF SECULAR INDIA AND ON THEIR PEOPLE.
THE RESULT WAS THAT THE MUSLIMS RECEIVED THEIR PAKISTAN ON PLATTER, TO LIVE AND BREED IN IT, TO ESTABLISH "MADRASSAS" TO PRODUCE TALIBAN, AND AT THE SAME TIME TO BITE INDIA' HEAD IN KASHMIR AND DIG THEIR TEETH DEEP IN SOFT HINDU FLESH. THEY STILL REMAIN DEEP IN INDIA'S SOFT HINDU FLESH, DRAWING BLOOD.
THOUGH THE SO-CALLED LEADERS, ALL CREATED BY THE BRITISH RULERS TO SERVE THEIR PURPOSE, WENT AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE NATION AND THE INTERESTS OF THEIR COUNTRY, THE MASSES WANTED TO TAKE IT OUT ON THE MUSLIMS WHO AT THAT TIME WERE BUSY EXTERMINATING THE NON MUSLIMS IN AREAS THEY OCCUPIED ON AUGUST 15, 1947. THEY SEEMED TO HAVE FULL LICENSE TO WIPE OUT THE MINORITIES FROM ONE END OF THE COUNTRY TO THE OTHER.
ON THE INDIAN SIDE THEY HAD A FORMIDABLE ALLY IN THE SHAPE OF "MAHATMA" MK GANDHI. HE WAS SO CONCERNED WITH THE SAFETY AND WELL-BEING OF THE MUSLIMS IN INDIA THAT HE NEVER WENT OVER TO PAKISTAN TO GIVE SOME SIGN OF HOPE TO THE WAILING AND GRIEVING HINDUS.
TO FURTHER BLUNT THE EDGE OF HINDU REACTION, BANDIT NEHRU PROMPTLY SPREAD THE THEORY THAT "NOT ALL MUSLIMS ARE BAD AND, THEREFORE, ONE SHOULD SPARE THEIR LIVES."
THE CLUELESS AND IGNORANT NATION COULD EASILY BE DEFLECTED FROM THEIR STRATEGIC GOAL AND MADE TO "LAY DOWN THEIR ARMS".
MANY HINDUS AND SIKHS WERE OF THE VIEW THAT "NOT ALL MUSLIMS WERE BAD" AND THEREFORE NONE OUGHT TO BE HARMED OR SENT OFF TO PAKISTAN.
THIS MAJOR SLIP UP, THIS MAJOR BLUNDER, IN FACT, THIS MAJOR CRIME AGAINST INDIA AND SECULARISM, HAS COST INDIA THOUSANDS OF LIVES, THREE WARS WITH PAKISTAN AND WILL EVENTUALLY LEAD TO ANNIHILATION OF EITHER PAKISTAN OR HINDUSTRAN. ONE SIMPLY CANNOT HAVE THE MUSLIMS THIS AND ALSO THAT SIDE OF THAT FRONTIER THAT RUNS BETWEEN LAHORE AND AMRITSAR, AND BETWEEN DHAKA AND KOLKATA.
WE NEED TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THE NATURE OF MUSLIMS. BELIEVERS IN KORAN MUST HAVE THEIR FIRST GOAL AS THE ELIMINATION OF KUFR FROM EARTH AND IN THE EYES OF MOHAMMED ALL THE HINDUS WERE KAFIRS, INFIDELS AND NON BELIEVERS.
MUSLIMS WERE THE MAIN VILLAINS, especially with regard to the brutal assassination of a prominent SECULAR leader that was done in the city of Bhagat PRAHLAD (Multan) on March 5, 1947.
Most Hindus today did not go through the same experience as the people of those FIVE PROVINCES that were doomed to go under the savage Islamic Law, imported from Arabia.
Many now also have Muslim friends and feel embarrassed to speak of PARTITION.
As stated earlier, the Muslims, who believe in Koran, cannot be secular. Our (HINDU) side was sworn "love all" types and softies, very softies, and ready to perish or vanish from those areas UNLIKE THE PALESTINIANS WHO STILL DARE TO PENETRATE ISRAEL TO BLOW HER UP.
At that time ALL MUSLIMS were for Pakistan. A new country under ISLAMIC rule was being created for them. It was their joy, thrill and PRIDE. Those who remained silent came to be regarded by our defeated side as "good" Muslims. MANY MUSLIMS, EARLING FAT SALARIES AND SITTING ON HIGH CHAIRS IN HINDUSTAN WOULDN'T GET EVEN A SWEEPER'S JOB IN EITHER PAKISTAN OR BANGLADESH. SO THEY POSE AS "GOOD MUSLIMS" TODAY.
This impression (of "good Muslims") was much strengthened by Nehru Dynasty who wished to see the Muslims rehabilitated at once after Partition.
We did not see any Muslim leader going on fast till death or protesting AGAINT the creation of Pakistan. Even the President of India today, ABDUL KALAM, has not once said, "Creation of Pakistan was evil and ought to be undone." To him Secularism is good for West Bengal but NOT for EAST Bengal.
.........Demand for Partition was a 100% MUSLIM affair.
Secondly, in Multan and Rawalpindi and in the rest of West Punjab, that bore the main brunt of Muslim attack, it was the Muslims who were calling the shots, going on orgy after orgy of massacres from town to town and village to village.
Thirdly, most Hindus today are as remote from the fires and killings of that time as most Chinese or Japanese are.
Today's atmosphere is different and the Muslims in India enjoy full citizenship rights though in Pakistan the non Muslims have no status whatsoever.
On our side now the phrase "not all were bad" is a deliberate ploy to make us lick secularism which is zero in Lahore. We are MADE to see the enemy grey. That is why India and the Hindus hold world record in slavery and the Sikhs hold world record in receiving persecution and beating.
The Muslims showed their TRUE COLOURS in 1947, the year of great bloodshed when tens of thousands of weeping and wailing widows, arrived in East Punjab and the rest of India seeking shelter.
Those were cruel times and we did not see one "all are not bad" type Muslim along the way.
The defeated Hindu is NOT meant to please the ruling elite of India today, nor to appease the INDIAN Muslims once again, and nor even to confirm to the prevailing secular wind in which Partition is referred to as Independence.
Partition is the story of savage Muslim onslaught on the integrity of India accompanied by brutality that resulted in India's fragmentation into three mutually warring parts.
We ought to be bold and defiant, like the heroes who resisted Partition tooth and nail, and dig out the deeply buried TRUTH, and show it to the world.
It is quite likely that MOST HINDUS are realising for the first time that there was Partition accompanied by murder, rape and arson, and exodus of some 15 million people.
For the last 56 years it has been only Independence as far as they are concerned.
We should therefore not shed a tear or make any concession for the "good" Muslims but think of the bad Muslims who demanded Partition, threatened civil war, and in the event SLAUGHTERED over ONE MILLION Hindus and Sikhs whom the "good Muslims" could not save.
We can also say with certainty that NOT ONE MUSLIM IN INDIA FEELS SORRY FOR INDIA'S LOSS OF TERRITORY OR SHEDS A TEAR FOR ALL THE HINDUS WHO WERE MASSACRED OR CHASED OUT OF THEIR HOMES.
They regard creation of Pakistan as Victory of Islam against the Infidels and to be in the interests of Islam and as per wishes of Qaid-i-Azam.
It is up to the present leadership of India to see the MUSLIMS as a TIME BOMB that will most certainly explode one day. We cannot blame anyone on earth if the HINDUS cannot recall the mighty EXPLOSIONS OF 1947 when India LOST five provinces overnight with all the Hindus TRAPPED IN THEM.
Let us be ON GUARD against such deviously subtle and misleading "secular" input that has created a different impression about the Muslims in PARTITIONED India today.
BY DEFINITION A MUSLIM CANNOT BE A GOOD MUSLIM AS FAR AS THE KAFIRS, THE INFIDELS AND THE HINDUS ARE CONCERNED. AT FRIST SOMEONE HAS TO EXPLAIN WHY THE HINDUS HOLD WORLD RECORD IN SLAVERY AND STILL CANNOT RAISE THEIR HEADS IN AYODHYA, OR BREATHE IN NORTH KASHMIR.
Finally, look at the UNO, a body of highly paid useless excellencies. Has anyone there noticed that an ISLAMIC CONSTITUTION, by definition, is gross infringement of human rights, and against the UN Charter of Human Rights?
.....................000000000
[_private/ftarc.htm]