LETTER TO THE PERISHING NATION OF HINDUS. THEIR BELOVED "MOTHER" (SECULAR INDIA) IS ONE THIRD LESS IN SIZE THAN WHAT SHE WAS BEFORE HER "RAPE" AND THE ILLEGITIMATE BIRTH OF ISLAMIC PAKISTAN:
Here is an interesting article about the despotic NEHRU family and all the top dog GANDHIS ("GANDOOS") in BROKEN BHARAT (PARTITIONED INDIA):
At the very beginning of his book, “THE NEHRU DYNASTY”, astrologer K.N.Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.
Jawaharlal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru.
And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze.
Now, who is this Feroze? He was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc. to “Anand Bhavan”, previously known as “Ishrat Manzil”, which once belonged to a Moslem lawyer named Mobarak Ali.
Motilal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer's name?
One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers.
In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies.
Why is it then that NOWHERE do we find Rajiv Gandhi's PATERNAL grandfather's name?
It appears that the reason is simply this: Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Moslem “gentleman” from the Junagadh area of Gujarat - Nawab Khan, who had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. (Pease note, “after CONVERTING her to Islam). This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.
Rajiv's father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.
Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, vide an affidavit.
Indira was Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Gurudev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanour, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with politics & women; while Kamla Nehru was in hospital.
Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira.
Indira changed her religion, became a Moslem woman, and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.
Nehru was not happy; Kamala was on deathbed.
The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand (“Mahatma”) Gandhi.
Gandhi called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young-man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit.
And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The Father of Nation (“Mahatma” Gandhi) did NOT mention this game of his in his famous book, “My Experiments with Truth”.
When Feroze and Indira returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption.
On this subject, writes M.O.Mathai (a long time Private Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by Government of India) “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” on page 94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942.
An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage."
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced.
Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence, “Trimurthi Bhavan”.
Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira.
The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to re-marry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or, Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze.
…………..He was the son of Mohammad Yunus.
Indira's second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded for having stolen a car.
Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He got another passport issued with his name changed to Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra's court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi.
And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (she had modelled for Bombay Dyeing, sporting a towel) was not so ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in his own ways and had many a relationship.
When Menaka got pregnant, her father Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry his daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka.
It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married to a Muslim girl of his choice. And it was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the freak plane accident.
In Yunus' book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis.
It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom.
Was he black mailing her (Indira) with the secret of who his real father was?
When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.
Nehru was no less in his own ways. At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru Age", page 206. Mathai writes:
"In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Banaras arrived in NewDelhi as a Sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology.
People, including MPs, thronged to her, in order to hear her discourses .
One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, and beautiful. meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his work at night.
During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru late in the night ...
……….Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.
She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found.
The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."
I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts.
Convents in such matters are extremely tight-lipped and secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian, blissfully ignorant of who his father was."
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.
Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul respectively.
What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative.
In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after, having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven.
The children's encyclopaedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today!
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.
Sonia, too, had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly-by-night language schools where foreign students come to learn English.
Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl (domestic help) in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time.
And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India's public (it was aired live on “door darshan”).
This is the Nehru dynasty that a lot of us Indians look up to, and now an Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification - being married into the Nehru family.
Maneka Gandhi is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model, or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.
Saying that an Italian should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sonia Maino (Sonia “Gandhi”) had served India like, say, Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians would have been proud of her.
IGNORANT HINDUS in India are the real “FOOLS” of this world. They have placed their EDUCATION in the hands of Axis Powers called “ITALY, ISLAM and the DAMN FOOL PSEUDO-SECULAR SUBSERVIENT NATIVE”.