Date: 5/7/2005


In a message dated 07/05/2005 10:39:25 GMT Daylight Time, xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx, quoting a report in The Hindustan Times, writes: Khabra and Vaz exuded confidence and pledged support to India. "I would very much hope that the government will treat India on par with China," Khabra said. ======================== What a wish of the two Indian JACKALS to feel superior to the TIGER called China! To BOTH MPs we say, "UNITED China has a government and PEOPLE who share spiritual, ideological, spiritual and political roots with each other. Khabra's PARTITIONED India has an ITALIAN and a MOHAMMEDAN (despite PARTITION) at top. With regard to Keith Vaz, he was born in YEMEN to share the "dishonour" of deceptive patriotism with SONIA KHAN who was born in ITALY. Lucky for him that to the HINDUS it does not matter at all if he was born in Yemen or Islamabad or even in Somalia. There are big differences between China and India. Surprising these MP's do not know! China is AKHAND, still in the same frontiers as in 1947. India is just one fragment of the original whole that was called Akhand Bharat by Father of Nation, Mahatma Gandhi. His Akhand Bharat died and SO DID HE disgracefully, within weeks thereafter. China is a SUPER POWER with a NUCLEAR bomb of its own and also is a PERMANENT MEMBER of Security Council. With regard to India's nuclear bombs her enemies can only LAUGH. The HINDUS should also laugh at the damn thing that cannot ensure their safe return to Srinagar, within their own country. Thge SIKHS, too, should laugh at the damn device which is unable to see them return to their homes in Lahore and Rawalpindi. Khabra, a defeated HINDU at heart under a misleading SIKH name, does not share the agony of his fellow Punjabis who came to his Hoshiarpur as wailing bedraggled penniless refugees (and widows and orphans). Keith Vaz is lucky not to share the history of Khabra's community that later got Operation "Blue Star" to get a BLOODY NOSE. The "Father of Indian Bomb" is one ABDUL KALAM who is also the SUPREME COMMANDER of Hindustan, that ought to have been declared "HINDU RASHTRA" on the dark night of Partition. The Sikhs, who had to flee before the ISLAMIC onslaught on Lahore, are now under orders to trust him with the safety of their Gurdwaras, Daughters and Dharti. Chinese membership of Security Council is not disputed by anyone on earth. There will be strong objections to INDIAN membership of that august body by YEMEN, PAKISTAN and even SOVEREIGN EAST BENGAL that is now called Bangladesh. To please one lame "MONGREL" dog of a country that could not defend Lahore nor the lives and property of Indians in Fiji and Uganda or of the Hindus in South Kashmir, and cannot call a spade a spade, the whole world cannot OFFEND all of FIFTY TWO anti infidel ISLAMIC republics. Can it? The rate of economic recovery of China where the crooks are promptly tried and HANGED, is lot more impressive than that of India where the criminals, crooks, traitors and "chors" are beyond law. (Just think of Rajiv Khan who imposed an Italian brat on all the native womanhood of great dignity, beauty and merit.) Another difference is that China actually OCCUPIES part of India while India does not occupy even one inch of China, nor has India pressed her claim over NORTH KASHMIR, that remains illegally occupied by Pakistan, in any international forum. The world is not blind to the fact that the Chinese stand up to danger UNITED, as one man. In the case of India, will an East Bengali, West Punjabi, North Kashmiri, sit and act united with a Sikh from Hoshiarpur or a Catholic from Kerala? Finally China is keen on dismantling its own PARTITION, that is, the separate status of TAIWAN. What about India of Piara Singh Khabra? (By birth Keith Vaz is NOT Indian however the Indians, especially the Gujaratis, may go out of their way to embrace, lick and EMPOWER him.) The entire LOK SABHA in New Delhi, where counterparts of Mr. Khabra sit, has ACCEPTED that bogus Partition (lethal strike on his India by Sword of Islam) as final act of history. The word PARTITION is not even in India's Constitution. So there is no question of officially paying any tribute to the memory of TWO MILLION INNOCENT "Kafirs" slaughtered by their MUSLIM fellow citizens in that year. Khabra who is an MP in UNITED Kingdom ought to have missed the word UNITED from the title of his own land of birth, not only India but also PUNJAB. His town of birth, Hoshiarpur, lies in ONE FRAGMENT of the original whole that was made of FIVE fragments (West Punjab, UNION TERRITORY of Chandigarh, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and of course EAST PUNJAB). These two nondescript INDIAN MP's in London, one a Secular Sikh Sewak, the other a strongly committed, devout and (devious) CATHOLIC, ought to have approached the Government of United Kingdom asking for an APOLOGY for breaking up their INDIA without any referendum, challenge, argument, fight or CONDITION. Is there no case for compensation from the British government to the victims like that by the Jews against Germany? They were also expected to notice their OWN degradation in not being privileged to get DUAL NATIONALITY that Sonia Khan back home enjoys (both Italian and Indian) but is determined to veto at Lok Sabha in case of Indians. They were also expected to notice their own degradation AS INDIANS since vide Article 370 of India's Constitution they cannot buy even a square inch of land in KASHMIR while a Kashmiri can go out of his State and buy a land, farm, shop or mansion anywhere in the rest of India- from East Punjab to Assam and down to Kerala. In other words, these two men, Khabra and Vase, have the constitutional status "dogs" in Kashmir, not only in West Punjab and East Bengal. There is a saying, "HE CAME, HE CONQUERED." In their case one can aptly say, "THEY CAME, SAT INVISIBLY AND VANISHED." So, be very SCEPTICAL when you read the headline, "Labour's Asian MP's to speak for India." They will not have the guts at Westminster (Parilament in London) to even speak for themselves! Look again at the word "ASIAN". They are not proud of India, yet "The Hindustan Times" of the slave nation thinks otherwise. There are many countries in Asia. Will proud Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Japan, even Sri Lanka allow these two INDIAN MP's to speak for them? O yes! Grand titles do please the INDIANS. One fragment out of three is still INDIA. One river out of five is still PUNJAB. You would recall the story when a servant, who cleans and sweeps the Master's kitchen and toilet all day long, dreams at night of driving Rolls Royce, sitting besides the Master's wife. Would someone kindly send us e-mail address of The Hindustan Times, or forward this mail to the editor? Thanks. .............------------------------------------- FULL PUBLISHED ITEM: Labour's Asian MPs pledge to speak for India The Hindustan Times, May 7 2005 London, May 6, 2005. Two veteran Asian-origin Labour MPs on Friday celebrated their victories in the British general elections and said they would continue to represent India's interests in Parliament. Piara Singh Khabra and Keith Vaz returned from their Southall and Leicester East constituencies respectively even as other Labour seats tumbled across Britain. Khabra, from Hoshiarpur in Punjab, won with a slightly reduced majority of 11,442 but an increased proportion of the vote. However, Vaz, a former junior minister of Goan origin, managed to increase both his winning margin and the proportion of votes - a remarkable achievement in a difficult election for Labour. British Prime Minister Tony Blair won a historic third consecutive term in office but his Labour Party returned to power with a sharply reduced majority. Khabra and Vaz were among the eight Asian-origin MPs voted into Parliament in Thursday's elections, including debutante Sailesh Vara, a solicitor who was elected from the safe Conservative seat of Cambridgeshire Northwest. Vara became the first Asian vice-chairman of the conservative party in 2001 and is the first ethnic Gujarati to be elected to the British parliament. He came to Britain from Uganda as a boy in 1972 and this was his third attempt at becoming an MP. The others to be re-elected were: Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham Perry Barr), Marsha Singh (Bardford West), Mohamed Sarwar (Glasgow Central), Parmjit Dhanda (Gloucester) and Dr Ashok Kumar (Middlesbrough South and Cleveland East). One Asian MP - Liberal Democrat Parmjit Gill, who won a by-election from Leicester South last year - lost his seat to Labour. Khabra and Vaz exuded confidence and pledged support to India. "I would very much hope that the government will treat India on par with China," Khabra said. "Gordon Brown (Chancellor of the Exchequer) has already shown his interest in China. I hope there will be further interest by the government in India, which is emerging as a major global economic and trading power." Vaz, whose constituency includes a large number of Indian-origin Britons, said he was "absolutely delighted" at his win, "especially after the results of the Labour Party". "I've been an MP for 18 years and I've always been a great friend of India. I hope the relationship between India and Britain will grow faster during Britain's coming presidency of the European Union," Vaz said. (Indo-Asian News Service),001301730000.htm ============================== BEWARE OF THE INDIAN "SHEEP" DRIVEN BY ITALY & ISLAM POSING AS THE CHINESE TIGER. ============================= ...........................000000000