Date: 5/6/2006
1. Here is a technique that can kick the program of Islam-Eradication into >Over-Drive, without spilling a single drop of blood. Based on sound >principles of economics, it enables the Hindu to operate from a position of >power, strength, and control. By upholding the inherent worth of the Hindu, >his liberty, and his self-respect, it assures the defense, survival, and >success of Hinduism. >All that this technique requires is courage, discipline, determination, and >steadfast-pursuit of a purpose, on the part of Hindus. Hindu's >Determination should be such as to allow nothing, to stand in the way of >the employment of this highly potent technique. > >2. Background Information. Boycott is an economic action, it is also a >concerted action, it has the power and vigor of a potent weapon. If applied >properly with team-work, it can work wonders, and can change everything in >the life of millions of people. What it requires is a decision on the part >of the boycotters to refuse to do any business or co-operation with the >target group. Boycott has been applied chiefly in labor disputes with the >management, but labor has no monopoly on the usage of boycott-technique. It >can be employed by consumers, business, political and other groups, in fact >by just about anybody. In the Hindu context, the boycotters would be the >Hindus, and the target groups would be the Moslems. > >What this technique means is this, that the Hindus would refuse to purchase >the goods or services of Moslems (by puchase of services is meant the >refusal of Hindus to hire Moslems as their employees). Hindus would refuse >to patronize firms and shops of the Moslems, the Hindus would also refuse >to deal with Hindus firms or shops that deal with the Moslems (or hire them >as employees). The idea behind the latter move is to put pressure on these >Hindu firms and shops, to quit dealing with the Moslems, and to join the >other Hindus in their boycott. > >3. Hindus must not beg, quibble, compromise, or argue to defend Hinduism. >These worthless approaches are defeatist and defensive techniques, these >have never worked for the Hindus, and are never going to work. We Hindus >have reached a point where there is no other recourse left to the Hindu, >other than to catch the bull by the horns, and fight back, via the >Boycott-Technique. Do ends justify the means? Before we evaluate the >morality of the boycott-technique, and label it as a mean-business, it >behooves us Hindus to ask ourselves a simple and sacrosanct question: > >Was the slaughter of hundreds of millions of our Hindus, and the demolition >of thousands of our Hindu Temples by the Moslems, justified, moral, or >dignified? If we Hindus understand the nature of our enemy, then we would >recongnize immediately, that if we conduct Dharma-Yudha against the >Barbarian-Moslems, then we cannot expect to come out alive. Now-a-days, >Dharam-Yudha is the most ridiculous item of the day. > >We Hindus need to discard Dharam-Yudha quickly, and instead rapidly become >adept and accomplished in total-wars, rather than waste time arguing >endlessly, on the morality or lack of morality, of the boycott-technique. >The boycott-technique is part of the Hindu Arsenal, it is part of Hindu's >Total War against the Sullas and Kharistas. The world does not care whether >Hinduism lives or dies, the Non-Hindu World could care less. In order for >the Hindu to survive and stay ahead of the game, the Hindu has to use the >boycott-technique, as a weapon of choice. This technique will unify and >fortify Hindus, and assure the survival of Hindus and their Hinduism. >Because a Moslem is a cheat by definition/training, his Quran sedulously >instructs him to cheat the Non-Moslem Kafirs, to cheat back the Sulla >therefore, is no Vice, it is a Virtue. It is a smart move to even the >scores, it is also an attempt to Flatter the Sulla by Imitating Him, no >Sulla can logically object to this kind of grand-flattery. > >4. The usage of the Boycott-Technique by the Hindu, is supported by >principles of liberty. The principle of Liberty gives every man the >absolute right, to deal with any other man, or refuse to deal with any >other man, the freedom of this choice comes from his basic right of >liberty. No body can question his right of liberty nor complain about it. >No body has a right to question any individual, to force him to give >reasons for his boycott. The complaints usually come when several people >get together, and compell others to join the boycott. But if the boycott is >done in a private ( and sneaky ) manner, and is given the appearance of a >Private Action, rather than a Group Action, this complaint also holds no >water. The boycotter, even though he is part of a boycotting group, simply >says that boycott is his individual decision, and that is the end of the >complaint. This stock-phrase demolishes the complaint, of a conspiracy >against the boycotted-group, and the boycotter stands > clean. > >5. A Moslem ( or a Christian) is not the intellectual equal of the Hindu, >nor is the Moral Equal of the Hindu, but still both Moslems and Christians >have been winning over the Hindus for 1200 years, because both Moslems and >Christians exceed the Hindus in aggressiveness, and because the Hindus use >defensive techniques, that are outdated. Hindu nearly always chooses >Low-Cost defensive techniques, which eventually end up as High-Cost >techniques. > >In order for the Hindu to succeed, the Hindu has to transform his mind, >discard his good-for-nothing defensive approaches, and go on the offensive. > >Hindu does not lack the resources, either educational, intellectual, >financial, or of any other type. What is lacking is Hindu's Determination >to take charge of his life, and go after the Sullas ( and Christians) in >earnest, to take revenge and punish the Jehadi Barbarian of Islam. If the >Hindu can get away from his defensive approaches, and switch over to >Aggressive Approaches, then he has more than enough power to blast the >Holy-Hell out of both Islam and Christianity. > >The Hindu can administer a Deadly Revenge on the Barbarian Moslems and >Christians, who have pillaged and plundered our sacred land of Bharat >Varsha for 1200 years plus, and have murdered hundreds of millions of our >Hindu Brethren. It would become easier for the Hindu to make up his mind, >if he becomes aware of the evil nature of Islam ( and of Christianity), and >of its GOSPEL OF HATE, which goes by the name of QURAN, and understands the >double-dealing, treachery, barbarism, and the brutal and perfidious nature >of these two Creeds, that originated in Arabia, the two Creeds whose >history is written in letters of Blood. > >6. THE BOYCOTT-TECHNIQUE: >The Boycott-Technique has two components, Hindu-Employers and >Hindu-Consumers: > >a. Hindu Employers (more than 95% of the business in India, is owned and >controlled by Hindus): No Hindu Employer should hire any Sulla-Employee. >The Hindu-Employer needs to be reminded that any time he hires Moslem >employees, he is keeping food out of the mouths of Hindu-Employees who are >out of work (There are millions of our own Hindu-Employees, our own Hindu >Brothers and Sisters, who are out of work and are starving. Why should we >Hindus feed the Sullas, rather than our own Hindu People?). We Hindus >should feed our own Hindu people, rather than the Sullas, who want to bury >us Kafir-Hindus. > >NOTE: The Hindu-Employers need to be very watchful, because many Sullas >conceal their Moslem-Names, and use a Phoney Hindu-Name for themselves, in >order to fool the Hindu Employers, to get a job from them. Thus Karim >becomes Kiran, and Rashid becomes Roshan, and so on. Because the Sullas use >this cheating-technique day in and day out, they have become masters of >this cheating-craft. The only way the Hindu-Employer can beat the >Sulla-Cheats, is to check out the prospective job-candidates thorougly. A >few Sullas would still be clever enough to get through the Hindu-Employer's >screening system. But once these cheats are discovered, the Hindu-Employer >should dismiss them immediately. > >We Hindus work hard for our money, we should not give our hard-earned money >to Sulla-Traitors, who only want to bury us Kafir-Hindus. > >b. Hindu-Consumers: No Hindu should buy any product ( goods or services) >from a shop owned or operated by a Sulla. No Hindu should buy any goods >that have been manufactured or procured by a Sulla. No Hindu should see any >movie that has been produced, directed, or acted in by any Sulla. The same >principle applies to other goods or services, in which any Sulla has a >part, either in owning, or producing or marketing of the product or >service. > >7. Is there a Monkey-Wrench in this Boycott-Technique? Yes, there is. > >The biggest Monkey-Wrench is in the "Implementation Of This Technique." >Most Hindu Employers, especially those who are inclined toward >Phoney-Liberalism (or Pseudo-Secularism), will not go for it, they would >cite all kinds of absurd and ridiculous reasons, these reasons are not >valid, they are bogus. These Phoney-Liberals would even cite piety, and >make reference to Hindu Dharma, against the practice and discrimination >involved in this technique (some Pseudos would even call it Adharma and >against Hindu Dharma). But this is not Adharma at all. Punishing or >Destroying Asuras is Not Adharma, it is Dharma. This technique is a must if >we Hindus know what is good for us. > >Is there a way out of this Monkey-Wrench? > >Yes, there is. Many Hindu Employers will not do it on their own, therefore, >they will need to be motivated and pushed by strong elements of Hindu >Society, particularly the Hindu-Outfits, such as VHP and Bajrang-Dal, RSS, >Shiv-Sena, Arya Samaj, Hindu Mahasabha, and other Hindu Outfits, who are in >the business of defending Hinduism. They all will need to come out with >their boxing-gloves, and have the courage to push the Hindu employers into >implementing this technique. It is also their job to monitor the Hindu >Employers, and see to it that Hindu Employers are actually implementing it, >and not bypassing it. > >8. If any governement activity enquires or raises questions to any Hindu >Employer about the practice of ethnic-discrimination by him, in his outfit, >all that the Hindu Employer has to do is to flat-out simply deny it. There >is no need nor any reason for a Hindu Employer to be honest with Moslems >(nor is it his duty to tell the government what he is upto, it is strictly >his private business to decide who he hires or fires), who are a degraded, >disgraceful group, who are bent upon eliminating us Hindus from India. > >Their Quran tells them that they don't have to be honest with Kafirs >(Non-Moslem Infidels). Therefore, there is no reason in the world for us >Hindus to be honest with Sullas. It is completely-correct on the part of >the Hindus to do a Reverse-Jehad on the Sullas, and pay them back in the >same coin. Their (Sullas) destruction should be at the top of our Hindu >priority. An Overwhelming Majority of employers in India is Hindu, and the >power of this technique should not be under-estimated. But it would take a >good deal of "courage and determination "to put this great technique into >practice. > >9. WHAT WOULD BE THE CONSEQUENCES IF ENOUGH HINDU-EMPLOYERS AND >HINDU-CONSUMERS PRACTISE THIS TECHNIQUE? > >The consequences will be a Total-Rout of Islam in India. Initially, there >will be a local retreat of Islam. The Retreat will become a Rout, as more >and more Hindus start instituting the technique of boycott. The Sulla will >have only three simple choices: > >a. Starve to Death >b. Move to Pakistan >c. Convert to Hinduism > >No Sulla would choose to starve to death. Practically no Sulla ( no more >than 1%) would chose to move to Pakistan. Why? Because Pakistan is a >Bigger-Hell for Moslems migrating from India, and besides Pakis don't want >them over there. More than 99% of the Sullas would choose the line of least >resistance, and choose to become Hindus. Even the most proud Sulla would >see the " Color Of Hindu's War" and make the smart decision of converting >to Hinduism. Only those Sullas would be employed by Hindu-Employers, who >convert to Hinduism, and swear to Total-Secrecy. Thus the >Boycott-Technique, as well as the Conversion-Process, would be conducted in >total-confidence and total-secrecy. > >10. This technique will begin the disintegration of Islam's House of seven >gables. Those Sullas who refuse to convert to Hindus, their employment with >the Hindu-Employer either does not start at all, or if already started, >would be terminated soon after the application of the boycott-technique. >These Sullas cannot expect any mercy, and they shall receive no mercy. > >The faster the Boycott-Technique is instituted, the faster shall be the >Retreat and Rout of Islam in India, and will bring to an end for ever, the >Islam's Career of Hell and Havoc in India. All the Moslems of India shall >be reduced, to something outside the "Semblance Of Islam." And this great >result can be achieved without spilling a single drop of blood. > >Believe you me: No amount of Islamic-Indoctrination can protect the Sulla >from the Gut-Wrenching Fear of EMPTY BELLY, and the so-called Invincibility >of Islam in India, will SNAP LIKE A DRY-TWIG. > >11. Here is how this technique, will take practical shape in the life of >the Sulla. Every day the Sulla goes without food, the annoying uncertainty >and nightmare of fear of starvation and dying, will drive him towards >insanity. All his consciousness, pride, and arrogance about his Islam, >Quran, and Allah would be lost. This numbing of perception, would compell >the Sulla to do anything, that is demanded of him. The idea of Islam's >Jehad would begin to fade in his memory. The only thing that the Sulla >would remember for certain, is the sight of food. > >The Boycott-Technique, would test the morale of the Sulla to the >breaking-point, and the Sulla would for sure, reach the breaking-point >pretty damn-fast. Panic-Stricken, the Sulla would lose his grip on Islam, >and fast-learn that his survival is assured only in conversion to Hinduism. >He will forget all about the lovely gardens of Janat (Moslem's Paradise) >where 72 houris are waiting for him, with their sexual favors, and where >Allah is waiting, to sprinkle rose-petals on the Sulla. He will forget all >this Islamic Non-sense, and would be more than willing to spend the rest of >his life, as well as of his children in Hinduism. He will discover that his >decision to become a Hindu, is far far better than being beaten to death by >hunger. > >12. Those Hindus who are inclined towards showing compassion to the Sullas, >need to be reminded that, if we Hindus do not get rid of the Sullas, then >these Sullas would make the life of the Hindu a Living-Hell. It is either >US or THEM, but not Both. >Islam is bent on eating the Non-Moslem Kafirs. Moslems are not supposed to >live in peace ( because they are supposed to conduct Jehad against the >Non-Moslems Kafirs), and they will not live in peace. Peace is a >suffocating cloud for the Moslems. That is why the Sullas proceed with >murdering speed to kill and get killed, to eat and get eaten. That is the >fastest way for them to reach their Janat (Moslem's Paradise). Moslems are >Distant-Relatives of Pigs and Hazrat Mohammad is the TOP-HOG. > >13. At this point in time, the US is thinking of developing small, tactical >nuclear weapons, to act as Bunker-Busters (known as Bunker-Nukers), to >demolish the deep caves of Al-Quaida and Talibans in Afghanistan. Majority >of Americans support this proposal of the US government. The Hindu >technique of Boycott does not approach the magnitude of ferocity of the US >technique. Compared to the US technique, the Hindu approach of Boycott, is >much more benign, and much more humane. We also know this for a fact, that >99% of the Sullas are ready to Rapidly Roll-Over into Hinduism, if Boycott >technique is applied with full Hindu Efforts (Note: All talks of >invincibility of Islam are a Big-Bluff). > >By not using the Boycott-Technique, we Hindus are being our worst enemies. >The effects of the Boycott-Technique are much more drastic (and draconian) >than those of any Reverse-Jaziya, that we could ever impose on the Sulla. > >14. No Hindu should believe that Islam is a religion of peace. That Islam >is a religion of peace, is the "longest burning joke." The commonsense >thing for us Hindus to do right now, is to un-leash the Hindu's Economic >Warfare (the Boycott-Technique) against the Sullas...and Islam shall be >wiped out of India. > > > >JAI HIND! JAI KASHATRIYA HINDU! JAI HINDUSTAN > >Arise Hindus! > > > > Please Visit > >http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.hinduunity.org/articles/attri/boycott.html > > > > Boycott of non-Hindu businesses in Kerala >HK Discussion 12/23/2005 1:40:00 AM > > > All major social institutions in Kerala – education, economy, >government, health care, and media/entertainment - are virtually controlled >by two minority cult groups (the Christians & the Muslims). Do you think it >is time the Hindus in Kerala organized a mass movement calling for a >boycott of non-Hindu businesses? > http://www.haindavakeralam.org/HKProcess.aspx?MODULE=ForumPage&FID=15 > > 000000000
[_private/ftarc.htm]