Date: 04 Sep 2007


My views about partition

What I think of Partition?
PUNJAB - Sikhs’ Most Precious Gift to India

Dr. M.S. Ahluwalia *

The various religious communities that populated India had joined together to drive out the British which was achieved in August, 1947. However, all attempts by the various actors to hold India together failed. This was mainly because of the Muslim apprehensions, who feared that they will be ruled by the Hindus who formed the majority. The British on their part appeased both the religious communities by offering their separate states- India and Pakistan. Sir Cyril Radcliff was assigned the job of creating two countries from one i.e. Hindustan (land of the Hindus) and Pakistan (land of the pure).

The partition of India and the creation of Pakistan have not been studied in one important aspect that concerns the Sikh community. The Sikhs, as an important religious minority were mainly concentrated in the region which now forms the Pakistani Punjab. The events leading to the partition made the Sikhs - the main victims of circumstance. The tussle between the Congress and the Muslim League led both to follow their own paths leading to non-cooperation and direct action respectively. (The chronology here has been sacrificed for coherence). The events leading to partition show that the Sikhs could not withstand the massive onslaught of religious fanaticism and separatism of the Muslim League on the one hand and the Congress tactics for the independence, on the other. Independence was achieved at a cost chiefly paid by the Sikhs of Punjab.

To put the record straight, the Sikhs never pushed for a separate state since they considered themselves an integral part of India. The brokers of power, however, took full advantage of Sikhs’ minority status. In the events leading to partition, it is pertinent to note that the Sikhs paid the bitterest price due to their ‘opposition’ of the congress and the communal propaganda of the Muslim League. It is a well known fact that without getting any political alternative, the Sikhs only got physical, religious and economic destabilization when the movement for the creation of Pakistan became unstoppable. A glimpse of the events leading to partition will amply demonstrate this bitter truth. 

The contradictory aims of the Congress and the Muslim League put Sikhs in the most awkward situation. One thing common with both the Hindus and the Muslims as such was that their leaders positioned themselves for power whereas the Sikhs, inept in political skills, failed to protect their interests and their homeland. During the negotiations they were fed with ‘craftily worded’ promises that were never honored.

Although both Gandhi and Jinnah were, apparently, working at cross purposes, it was the Gandhi who proposed a formula to Mr. Jinnah, that which was basically clear acceptance of the partition and creation of Pakistan.
In May 1944 Gandhi declared that at the end of the war (WW-II), a commission would be asked to demarcate the ‘contiguous districts’ in North West and East India having an absolute majority. In the areas thus demarcated a plebiscite of the adult population would be taken. If the majority voted for separate sovereign state it would be given effect to but border districts would have the option to join one of the new states. In the event of separation, mutual agreements would be entered into for safeguarding defence, commerce and communications. These terms would be binding when the British transferred the full power to India.

Before independence the Sikhs under the leadership of Master Tara Singh could not pledge unconditional support either to the Congress or to the Muslim League as they could not rely on any one, and this was amply confirmed by the subsequent events. At the same time he was quite aware of the political advantages of being associated with India to maintain Sikhs’ strong numerical representation in the army. It was quite apparent that neither of the two parties will extend any favors to the Sikhs, without some strings being attached. In fact the move for a separate homeland had been gaining ground ever since ‘Moti Lal Nehru Report’ came out recommending a 30% quota (reservation) for the Sikhs in Punjab Provincial Legislature. 

Mahatma Gandhi, in his own way, also approved the recommendations made in the Nehru Report, while also conceding that they had not done justice to the Sikhs. Congress, however, could not afford to lose the confidence of the Sikh community as a whole and then face the Muslim League's demands and the spread of communal virus. Accordingly a formal resolution was adopted at the Congress Session at Lahore saying;

"This Congress assures the Sikhs and the Muslims and other minorities that no solution thereof, in any future constitution will be accepted by the Congress that does not give full satisfaction to the parties concerned".

Meanwhile Mr. Jinnah had emerged as the blue eyed boy of the British. Events favoring the formation of Pakistan moved very fast. The Muslim League at its annual session held at Lahore in March 1940 finally showed their true colors in favour of a separate Sovereign State of Pakistan for the Muslims. This demand for Pakistan led all the Sikh leaders to unite on one platform to oppose the formation of Pakistan. They held an anti-Pakistan Conference at Lahore on December 01, 1940 in which a unanimous resolution was passed to oppose the formation of Pakistan. 

The political situation in Punjab became more worrisome with ‘Muslim League’ adopting uncompromising communal overtones. This compelled the Sikhs to demand a partition of the united Punjab. Primary aim was to get some leverage for the Sikhs in the eastern portion of the Province. It is in this context that the demand for Azad Punjab was conceived, mainly in the spirit of countering the Muslim demand for Pakistan. 
Although the Akalis got unduly labeled as ‘opportunists lacking any ideology’, the fact remains that there were communal elements in all parties and there was no reason to single out the Akali leadership for public lynching. The subsequent events proved beyond any doubt that the Sikhs were ever eager to stake their all for the sake of their motherland. 

In the long and historic struggle for independence, the best gift the Akalis gave to India was - very precious, Eastern half of Punjab – the granary of India. ■

* 761/C, Sector 63, S.A.S. Nagar (MOHALI)-160062
E. Mail :