MUSLIMS VS. AMARNATH SHRINE IN KASHMIR
Date: 27 Jun 2008
INTOLERANT MUSLIMS ARE WILLING TO DECLARE JEHAD OVER A HINDU TEMPLE WHILE ALL NAIN MOSQUES IN INDIA WERE BUILT OVER LAND AFTER RAZING THE TEMPLES TO GROUND.
HINDU LEADERS HAVE NO SPINE TO CLAIM BACK THE LAND WHERE JAMA MASJID IN DELHI, MOSQUES IN AYODHYA AND MATHURA STAND.
SO, THOSE WHO HAVE NO GUTS TO CLAIM, ARE ASKED BY THEIR ENEMIES TO DISAPPEAR FROM EARTH.
The tragic events in Kashmir are being reported by the Secular Media as Anti-India Riots. How can Muslims, the pinnacle of peace and tolerance be anti-India? It appears the Media has got it wrong!
The land allocation for the Amarnath Shrine to cope with the growing number of pilgrims is an eyesore. The land is not at all a forest land and no permanent structure is proposed, but is a 'worthy' cause for objections!
Kashmir is not only a beautiful scenic land, but it is alleged by our Secularists that it is the symbol of communal harmony, because it is blessed with Moderate Sufi philosophy, which is not hostile to non-Muslims. Alas! the facts speak otherwise. The Kashmiri Pandits have been chased murderously out of their hearths and homes. Killings of Hindus and Sikhs, tourists and the Amarnath Yatris have frequently happened. Kashmir is no less than a Waqf Land now!
Disgracefully, the unfortunate victims of the partition; demanded by the Muslims, who strayed into Jammu and Kasmir 60 years ago are not recognised as the bonafide citizens of the State, because they are not Muslims.
When will our Secularists and apologists come to the term that Muslims(Kashmiri or not) have their overriding loyalty to the Ummah, which is firmly committed to Nizam-e-Mustapha?