date: 06 jul 2008 comment: hindus attacked with grenades ignorant hindus whiners, at the time of independence the cunning british people gave the power in bhaarat to their stooges. these pro-british, pro-english ant anti-hindu leaders have created such a havoc by giving lots of facilities to muslims and christians at the cost of hindus that that theses pro-british, anti- hindu stooges are destroying hindus and bhaarat from with in bhaarat. these anti hindu rulers are looting hindu money collected from hindu tax payers and hindu temples; hindu money is given to muslims and christians. no money is touched by anti hindu governments of bhaarat of mosques and churches while anti- hindu governments since independence has depleted hindu temples by looting their money. unfortunately almost 100 percent media is also anti ?indu in bhaarat as media is owned either by christians or muslims. muslims get trillions of rupees in aid and benefits from hindus in bhaarat while they cannot even tolerate transfer a piece of nearly 40 hectares of forest land adjacent to the amarnath temple for hindu pilgrimages. what did we get by being peaceful, non-violent, and gandhian? our parents and their parents followed gandhism and nehruism. what have they left us with? today muslims can come out on the streets and change the course of law, politics. what are we getting? who is bothered about us? intimidation, bullying, mini-pakistan, no go areas for hindus and police this is all that we are being faced with. if we would have done in 1947 what vhp - bjp are doing now this country would have been some what better, safer and terror free place to live in. kashmiri hindus?access to amarnathji has been controlled by muslims and like slaves we are expected to bow. if nothing, bhaaratiya hindus have not learnt the value of freedom. bhaarat is still to get freedom from the stooges of british people and anti-hindu people. we have to express ourselves and act in every manner possible to force the powers that be to take notice of hindus as well. history will say that the peace loving hindus did not escalate the problem. like the pandavas, they only wanted the 5 villages so that they could peacefully exist but were denied even pilgrimage facilities in their own homeland by insensitive politicians and communalists. it is then that hindus demanded their full fair share. the issue of denial of services to amarnathji pilgrims must open our eyes to the reality of kashmir today and shake we hindus from lethargy. in the least, we should make our cause to be as espoused as the tibetan cause. article 370 must be abolished for the rights of hindus in kashmir. unluckily for hindus minorities everywhere in bhaarat are in command , anti hindu people are in charge and will continue to be in ever more devastating scale under congress and communist rule. many people have expressed their views on this topic. i will mail some of these comments. if you get any topic as repetition, then i appologise but still there are lots of people who still do not know what the issues are and problems which hindus are facing. for the benefit of those people these various comments would be sent again with small adjustments. hindus attacked with grenades in kashmir why do we feel offended if hindus are attacked by grenades? this is a natural method for muslims to reward hindu goodness. every good turn by hindu deserves a grenade, because every good turn by hindu destroys musliness of the receiver. hindus harbored muslims for 800 years or more. and how did they repay??? by creating pakistan!! bangladeshi were liberated by indians. how did they repay...by illegal infiltrarion in india!!! now kashmir is cocooned safely by article 370 and what is appreciation...drive amarnath shrine board and pilgrims to suffering levels!!! to expect any good appreciation from muslims is like expecting pigs to fly. only way to make them happy is to invite more grenades. this fighting enemy of hindus, the muslims is an eye wash, whitewash, an illusion. our government at delhi and leaders has assumed a muslim mind set which is reinforced by vote bank. your slogan jay hind is kept alive only as long as muslims allow. as soon as they develop phobia, jay hind will bite the dust. see all the way down from 1947...where have hindus won??? nowhere!!! every time they got the best and hindus just waved gita and vedas with zilch gains!!! this amarnath fight is already lost by hindus- by revocation of land allocation. so what are you fighting against...but a shadow??? ramesh jhalla yes, we hindus don? have any guns in our hands. we don? have any armed force in our hands or on our side. but still we are fighting ????.. ?akhanda bharath ki jai ? it is high time hindus should rise and stand up for themselves. militancy needs to be met with militancy. all authorities bow in front of militancy and it is the need of the current times. people should know that, the issue of helping hajj pilgrims is still going on in the supreme court. but i think the government should not provide money for religious activities. even if it provides, it should provide it for all the religions. hindus are all suffering due to the short term policies like reservation and subsidy for hajj started by congress. these are one way policies as no political party can remove them once they are active. congress is doing the same mistake by encouraging christian subsidy. it has started with 4 crores and would soon increase to hundreds of crores and extend to all other states. this is a short vision goal which is going to ruin the country. soon all other states and religions will be asking for it and will make it tough on the financial exchequer. on one hand we don't have enough money for welfare policies and congress is encouraging religious based expenses. it has 3 serious disadvantages by selectively giving it to certain religions it is driving a dangerous wedge among people of various communities and religions. by starting a new trend, the plan allocation is only going to increase year by year and cut into the money allotted for welfare policies other states would start including this and if they don't then opposition parties and people will take it up as a political issue. hajj which was started for poor muslims probably in kerala state has extended to all states and has become into a multi crore spending by the state governments and central government. any government should not start policies which are discriminatory in nature. what andhra chief minister ysr and congress have been doing like hajj subsidy and christian pilgrimage subsidy are against hindus. either give it to all religions or don't give it to any. why is congress hell bent on playing minority politics driving the country on religious basis? some people say is ysr giving funding to temples...these people are kidding...it is the same money generated by the endowments departments from hundis, temple lands. it doesn't belong to the government. but in case of churches and mosques, the money is not being generated by people; it is a freebie from the government which actually belongs to hindus and hindu temples. but by starting 5% reservation for muslims and christian religious subsidy chander samuel reddy has taken a couple of steps backwards. these are very dangerous steps he has taken, as the spending on christian pilgrimages is only going to increase and reservation on muslims is only going to stay. andhra chief minister chander samuel reddy is pursuing such dangerous policies which have very bad repercussions on all state governments and the social fabric of the country. he was only chief minister in the country who had guts to put in security cameras all over the mosques in the old city. there were no communal riots, there was one and it was neutralized immediately by acting tough. there were no bomb blasts during chander bhanu? rule in old city as he acted tough on islamic terrorists. on other hand why did ysr transfer sanjay jaju, who was doing very good for hyderabad as the municipal commissioner...just because he wanted to remove all religious/illegal structures which obstructed the road widening? why have been there a lot of blasts in hyderabad during his rule? is ysr not soft on islamists? who cares about hindu humiliation in kashmir - asianet 03/07/2008 00:05:19 hk thiruvananthapuram: for asianet, iraq is much closer than kashmir, for asianet saddam hussein has more news value than amarnath pilgrims as per asianet news reporter venu, why should be there a hartal in kerala in amarnath issue as it is much far away from kerala? when asianet aired live coverage of the execution of saddam hussien along with a emotionally charged reporting to appease muslims many hindu viewers wondered why this much sympathy to a dictator like saddam hussein! even communist party called for a hartal against saddam hussein? execution! asianet which fumes on this hartal, never came with any report to highlight the worst form of jihadi appeasement and hindu discrimination unfolded in j&k over the days. they never called a communist leader to ask why their party supported the jihadi antinational element. they never called a congress leader to ask why their government succumbed to jihadi pressure after giving hope to hindus they never called a congress leader to ask why their government succumbed to jihadi pressure after giving hope to hindus they never called a muslim leader asking their opinion on the treatment of minority muslims in a muslim majority state if asianet want to convey that hartal is against the development of a state? economy ?it? well understood and such discussions should be encouraged for the betterment of our society. but it becomes a bias when a reporter dares to ask whether, is it worth to protest against hindu humiliation? it is high time hindus should rise and stand up for themselves. militancy needs to be met with militancy. all authorities bow in front of militancy and it is the need of the current times. ================================ 000000000
HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.