Where is the public outrage over squandered Billions?

Date: 16 Dec 2010


Subject:Where is the public outrage over squandered Billions? Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:47:13 -0500 Where is the public outrage over squandered Billions? \\\\\\\\\\ It seems that many Bhaaratiya people have become immune to corruption and have taken corruption as part of the daily life. For some people After Nehru- Gandhi family, there might be deluge, darkness or no proper governance in Bhaarat and they want to live under mega scams of congress rule willingly or unwillingly and have no desire to explore other alternatives, \\\\\\\\\\ FOR ALL YOU SONIA GHANDHI's FANS\\\\\\\\\\\ http://www.youtube.com/watch v=84fkL6yB1X8&annotation_id= annotation_132410&feature=iv \\\\\\\\\\ http://www.youtube.com/watch annotation_id=annotation_ 365070&v=WYwQkhWMXIQ&feature= iv \\\\\\\\\\ Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi \\\\\\\ THE MOTHER SUPERIOR OF ALL CORRUPTION IN THE UPA II GOVERNMENT IN NEW DELHI IS THE FIRANGI MEMSAHIB SONIA GANDHI. In her over weening political arrogance and bumptiousness, she reminds us all about Catherine de' Medici (1519 – 1589) (born in Florence, Italy) who later became Queen of France, and Lucrezia Borgia (18 April 1480 – 24 June 1519). Authentic history tells us that both these political women were incorrigible political criminals!! I am presenting below the excerpts from the website of Janata Party of Dr Subramanian Swamy relating to the shady background and criminal antecedents including Nazi and KGB connections of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi who fully deserves to be compared with Catherine de' Medici (1519 – 1589) (born in Florence, Italy) who later became Queen of France, and Lucrezia Borgia (1480 – 1519). Authentic history tells us that both these political women were incorrigible political criminals of the most reprehensible kind! Dr Subramanian Swamy has given all the facts relating to the shady past and criminal record of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi which can make the record of Catherine de' Medici and Lucrezia Borgia pale into insignificance. I am presenting below excerpts from Dr Subramanian Swamy’s website. I. INTRODUCTION Patriotic Indians should thank the President of India for having the courage, by citing a legal hitch, to dissuade Ms. Sonia Gandhi from staking her claim to form the government on May 17th this year. She therefore, despite all the contrived media hype, did not, and could not, become the Prime Minister of 1 billion plus people of India. It can now be said that Bharat Mata has been saved from a monumental, devastating, and permanent injury to her national interest and to the patriotic psyche of Indians. \\\\\\\\\\ Therefore, it should be the resolve of every Indian to make any and every effort that can be made in a democracy, to ensure that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is kept permanently out of reckoning for any public office. For those who instinctively understand that imperative, this Note has been written to explain the factual basis for this rational determination, and suggest what patriotic Indians can do now to implement that democratic and patriotic resolution. \\\\\\\\\\ My opposition to Ms. Sonia Gandhi is not merely because she is Italian---born, although that by itself is a major issue. In other democratic countries, including in Italy, such an issue [of foreign-born aspiring to be head of government]would not even arise at all because the issue has already been settled by incorporating into law that a person cannot hold the highest public office unless he or she is native born. \\\\\\\\\\\ In India there is no such law but the President, according my knowledge, has correctly acted on a proviso to Section 5 of the Indian Citizenship Act[1955] which requires the Union Home Ministry to lay down conditions to Indian citizenship acquired by foreigners by registration, condition based on the principle of reciprocity [see annexure 1 & 2]. In Ms Gandhi’s case, such of those conditions that apply to Indians on becoming citizens of Italy, would apply to her. \\\\\\\\ The President reportedly had communicated to Ms. Gandhi on the afternoon of May 17, 2004, that if she insisted on being invited to form the government, he would want first to clarify, on a reference to the Supreme Court, whether in view of this proviso her appointment as PM could be successfully challenged in the court. \\\\\\\\\\\ It is fair to assume that this report of the President’s decision is correct, since the President had before him my petition dated May 15, 2004 [see Annexure-3] making just that point--- that Ms. Gandhi’s citizenship is conditional, and in particular she cannot be the PM legally. The President had also given me an appointment at 12.45 PM on May 17, 2004 to explain my submissions in person, which I did. I also told him that I would challenge such a unconstitutional appointment in the Supreme Court just as I had in 2001 when Ms Jayalalitha was illegally sworn in as Chief Minister by the Tamil Nadu Governor. \\\\\\\ In that case, the Supreme Court had after hearing me and many other constitutional luminaries, upheld my contention that mere majority in the House is insufficient for being sworn in to a constitutional office, and that the constitutional appointing authority must ensure that there are no disqualifications as well. Ms. Jayalalitha had therefore to step down because she had been disqualified by her conviction in a trial court in the TANSI corruption case [filed by me as a private complaint]. She was subsequently acquitted by the Madras High Court, and hence became eligible the following year. \\\\\\\ I also cited to the President a 1962 Allahabad High Court case which held that this proviso in the Citizenship Act was binding and lawful. \\\\\\\\\\ The nation by the stalling of Sonia becoming Prime Minister of India, has thus got an unexpected but temporary reprieve, a reprieve received not only because her citizenship of India by registration is not equal to one by birth even by Indian law, but a reprieve more because of the national security risk that was averted. \\\\\\\\\\ To comprehend that risk, we must however first understand who Sonia Gandhi really is and what kind of danger she, her family and her friends in Italy, hold for India’s national security. Very little is known about the Mainos’ murky past, and the little that we are told about Sonia are lies. In other words, Indians do not know who Sonia really is or what she represents [see Annexure-4]. \\\\\\\\\ Even for an Indian born citizen, we find it difficult to know a person’s true background, but for a foreign-born it is extremely hard because of the remoteness of the place and the language barrier for most people, in this case---Italian. \\\\\\\\ This note is thus an aide d’memoir of certain verifiable facts that taken together constitute the danger that Sonia Gandhi represents for the nation. And that is the real Sonia and what she represents. THREE LIES \\\\\\\\\\ Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s background as publicized by her and her Congress Party is based on three lies in order to hide the ugly reality of her life. \\\\\\\ First, her real name is Antonia not Sonia. This was revealed by the Italian Ambassador in New Delhi in a letter dated April 27, 1983 [see Annexure-5] to the Union Home Ministry which letter has not been made public. Antonia is Sonia’s real name as stated in her birth certificate. Sonia is the name given to her subsequently by her father, Stefano Maino [now deceased]. He had been a prisoner of war in Russia during World War II. Stefano had joined the Nazi army as a volunteer, as many Italian fascists had done. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two years in a Russian jail, Sonia’s father had become quite pro-Soviet, especially after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists’ properties including his. Second, Sonia was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of her father’s connection with the Nazis and Mussolini’s Fascists, and her family’s continuing connections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still surviving in Italy since the end of the War. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other explanation for this otherwise meaningless lie. Third, Sonia Gandhi has not studied beyond High School. But she has falsely claimed in her sworn affidavit [see Annexure-6] filed as a contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma in English from the prestigious University of Cambridge, UK. \\\\\\\\\\ Earlier, in 1999 in her biographical data given under her signature to the Lok Sabha Secretariat and which was published in Parliament’s Who’s Who, she had made the same false claim [see Annexure-7]. \\\\\\\\\\\ But later she wrote to the Lok Sabha Speaker, after I had pointed it out to him in a written complaint of a Breach of Ethics of the Lok Sabha, that it was a “typing mistake”. This qualifies her for inclusion thus in the the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest typing mistake in history. \\\\\\\\\\\ The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never studied in any college anywhere. She did go to a Catholic nun--run seminary school called Maria Ausiliatrice in Giaveno [15 kms from her adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days had forced young Italian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor those days. Sonia’s father was a mason and mother a share cropper [now the family is worth at least $ 2 billion: (see Annexure-10)]. \\\\\\\\\\ Sonia thus went to the town of Cambridge UK and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School [which has since 1990 been wound up]. That is her “education”--- enough English language to get domestic help jobs. \\\\\\\\ But since in Indian society, education is socially highly valued, thus to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi wilfully lied about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. This also violated the spirit of the Supreme Court judgment requiring candidates to reveal their educational qualification on an affidavit [see Annexure-8]. \\\\\\\\\These three lies indicate that Ms. Sonia Gandhi has something to hide, or has a hidden agenda for India to brazenly fool Indians for some ulterior purpose. We therefore need to find out more about her. \\\\\\\\\\\\\ III SONIA'S KGB CONNECTIONS\\\\\\\\ Such has been the patronage from the beginning extended to Sonia Gandhi and her Italian family from the Soviets. When a Prime Minister of India’s son dates a girl in London, the KGB which valued Indo-Soviet relations, would naturally investigate her. They had, and found out that she was the daughter of Stefano, their old reliable Italian contact. Thus, Sonia married to Rajiv, meant deep access for the Soviets, into the household of the Indian Prime Minister. Hence cementing the Rajiv-Sonia relations was in the Soviet national interest and they went to work on it. And they did, through their moles in the Indira Gandhi camp. \\\\\\\\\\\ After her marriage to Rajiv, the Soviet connection with the Mainos was fortified and nurtured by generous financial help through commissions and kick-backs on every Indo—Soviet trade deal and defence purchases. According to the respected Swiss magazine, Schweitzer Illustrate [November 1991 issue; see Annexure-10] Rajiv Gandhi had about $2 billion in numbered Swiss bank accounts—which Sonia inherited upon his assassination. \\\\\\\\\\ Dr. Yevgenia Albats, Ph.D[Harvard], is a noted Russian scholar and journalist, and was a member of the KGB Commission set up by President Yeltsin in August 1991. She was privy to the Soviet intelligence files that documented these deals and KGB facilitation of the same. In her book—“The State Within a State: The KGB in the Soviet Union”, she even gives the reference numbers of such intelligence files [see Annexure-11] which can now be accessed by any Indian government through a formal request to the Kremlin. \\\\\\\\\\\ The Russian Government in 1992 was confronted with the Albats’ disclosure by the media. The official spokesperson of the government confirmed the veracity of the disclosure [which was published in Hindu in 1992; see Annexure-12]. The spokesperson defended such financial payments as necessary in “Soviet ideological interest”. Part of the funds were used by the Maino family to fund loyal Congress party candidates in the General Elections [see Annexure-13]. \\\\\\\\\\\\ When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, things changed for Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Her patron nation had been disbanded into 16 countries. The rump that became Russia was in a financial mess and disorder. So, Ms. Sonia Gandhi switched and became a supporter of another communist country much to the annoyance of the Russians. \\\\\\\\\ The national security ramification of this ‘annoyance’ is now significant: The President of Russia today is Putin, a former dyed-in-the-wool KGB officer. Upon Dr. Manmohan Singh’s government taking office, Russia called back it’s career diplomat Ambassador in New Delhi and immediately posted in his place, as the new Ambassador, a person who was the KGB station chief in New Delhi during the 1970s. \\\\\\\\\\ In view of Dr. Albats revelation, it stands to reason that the new Ambassador would have known first hand about Sonia’s connections with the KGB. He may have in fact been her “controller” and local contact. The new Indian government today which is defacto Sonia’s, cannot afford to annoy him or even disregard Russian demands that come from him. The Sonia coterie will obviously seek to placate him so as not to risk exposure. Is this not a major national security risk for India and a delicate matter for the nation’s sovereignty? \\\\\\\\ Of course, all Indians would like good normal and healthy relations with Russia. Who can forget their assistance to us in times of need? Today’s Russia is the residual legatee of that Soviet Union which helped India. But just because of that, should we tolerate those in our government set up having clandestine links with a foreign spy agency? In the United States, the government did not tolerate an American spying for Israel even though the two countries are as close as any two countries can be. National security and friendship are as different as chalk and cheese. \\\\\\\\\\\ In December 2001, I had filed a Writ Petition in the Delhi High Court with the photocopies of the KGB documents, and sought a CBI investigation which the Vajpayee Government was stoutly refusing. Earlier, Minister of State for CBI, Vasundara Raje[now Rajasthan CM], on my letter dated March 3, 2001, had ordered the CBI to investigate. But after Sonia Gandhi and her party stalled the proceedings of Parliament on this issue, the then Prime Minister Vajpayee overruled and cancelled Vasundara’s direction to the CBI. \\\\\\\\\\ The Delhi High Court in May 2002 issued a direction to the CBI to ascertain from Russia the truth of my charges. The CBI procrastinated for two years, and finally told the Court that without an FIR registered, the Russians will not entertain any such query. But who stopped the CBI from registering an FIR? The Vajpayee government! And why? Thereby hangs another tale. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ IV SONIA'S CONTEMPT FOR LAWS OF INDIA \\\\\\\\\\\ After Sonia married Rajiv, she and her Italian family aided by friend and Snam Progetti’s New Delhi resident Ottavio Quattrocchi, went about minting money with scant regard for Indian laws and treasures. Within a few years the Mainos rose from utter poverty to become billionaires [see Annexure-14]. There was no area that was left out for the rip-off. On November 19, 1974, as fresh entrant to Parliament, I had asked the then Prime Minister Ms. Indira Gandhi on the floor of the House if her daughter-in-law, Sonia Gandhi, was acting as an insurance agent of a public sector insurance company[Oriental Fire&Insurance], giving the Prime Minister’s official residence as her business address, and using undue influence to get insured the officers of the PMO, while remaining as an Italian citizen[thus violating FERA]. There was an uproar in Parliament, but Mrs. Indira Gandhi had no alternative but to cut her losses. She made a rare admission in a written reply a few days later that it indeed was so, and that it was by mistake, but that Sonia had resigned from her insurance agency[after my question]. But Sonia was incorrigible. Her contempt for Indian law continued to manifest. \\\\\\\\\\ The Supreme Court Justice A.C. Gupta Commission set up by the Janata Party government in 1977 came out with a voluminous report on the Maruti Company then owned by the Gandhi family, and has listed eight violations of FERA, Companies Act, and Foreigners Registration Act by Sonia Gandhi. She was never prosecuted, but can still be prosecuted because under Indian law, economic crimes are not subject to the statute of limitation. In January 1980, Indira Gandhi returned as Prime Minister. The first thing Sonia did was to enroll herself as a voter. This was a gross violation of the law, enough to cause cancellation of her visa [since she was admittedly an Italian citizen then]. There was some hullabaloo in the press about it, so the Delhi Chief Electoral Officer got her name deleted in 1982. But in January 1983, she again enrolled herself as a voter even while as a foreigner [she first applied for citizenship in April 1983] (see Annexure-15). \\\\\\\\\\\\\ More recently, A.G. Noorani is his book: Citizen’s Rights, Judges, and State Accountability records [page 318] that Ms. Sonia Gandhi had made available to a foreign national the secret papers of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru obviously illegally in her possession, and comments as follows: \\\\\\\\ “Sonia Gandhi has no right to hold them in her possession at all, let alone decide whom to accord permission for access to them” Such is her revealed disdain for Indian laws and that is her mindset even today. She suffers from a neo-imperialist mentality. \\\\\\\\\ For more details about the glory and grandeur of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi see : (http://www.janataparty.org/sonia.html \\\\\\\\\\\ CONCLUSION Economic chamcha-s, rampant corruption: India's Sonia Raj, Scandal Raj. Chamcha Raj. Corruption Raj. \\\\\\\\\\\ Singhasan Khaali Karo Ke Janata Aati Hai: Ramdhari Singh Dinakar \\\\\\\\\\ Let us introspect on why our elders fought and won Swarajya Hindusthan. What type of Hindusthan do we want to leave for our children as a heritage continuum? \\\\\\\\\\ Let us introspect on the fountainhead of the Chamcha Raj and let there be a Quit India Movement: bhaago, loot waapas karo. भागो -- भारतीय निधि की लूट वापस करो kalyan \\\\\\\ From: rvreddy393@bsnl.in, \\\\\\\\\\\\ It cannot be imagined how shamelessly Sonia Gandhi says :" WE HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE ON 2-G " The main recipients appear to be Sonia and her family..Dr. Subramanian Swamy has given lucid details as to how the funds have been siphoned off in favour of Sonia and her relatives / kin. If she has nothing to fear, then why is Congress fearing the JPC probe???..The tragedy is that we have a PM who is completely inactive and does not want to take any initiative. There is no WILL to unearth the scam...How can it, when the Congress / UPA members are fully involved in it???The opposition is right in insisting on a JPC probe. Hope they do not relent and stick to their stand. The softness by Karunanidhi / Deva Gowda cannot be ruled out, given to his un-trusty worthiness and the Scams that he/ his tainted son / his party are reportedly involved. \\\\\\\\\\ Dr.R.V.Reddy BS(USA), MS(USA), Ph.D(USA), MBA \\\\\\\\\\ UN CONSULTANT, Secunderabad \\\\\\\\\\\ From: S. Kalyanaraman <kalyan97@gmail.com> Whom is he (PM) protecting?\\\\\\\\\ PM is protecting Antonia Maino aka Sonia Gandhi. Yes, Raja and MuKa are footnotes, disposable curry-leaves. The charge made by Dr. Swamy about moneys received by Sonia's family members Anushka and Nadia remains unanswered. So is the charge against Indian Profumo, PC left unanswered. In UK when the Profumo scandal broke, Lord Dunning completed the enquiry in 49 days and Profumo the War Minister resigned, so did his PM Malcolm. Indian Profumo continues as Home Minister incharge of national security despite the scandal reported widely and charge made with specific accounts of escapades.\\\\\\\\ An unasked question is: Why is the media not taking up and investigating these charges? Will the opposition stay the course and force a mid-term poll to unseat this Sonia Raj, Scandal Raj, Chamcha Raj?\\\\\\\\\\\ The story will be complete when the Italian citizenship of Sonia dynasty is reconfirmed. Belligerence and holding forth the threat of a mid-term poll (to UPA-2 allies NCP, TMC and DMK) is a cover-up operation.\\\\\\\\\\\ It is the duty of the society to destroy the Asuras. If kings or the Govrnment cannot destroy the bad people, the people should wipe out them along with the government or Kings. \\\\\\\ Why and how was it that by studying Gitaa Gindhiji advised Hidus to follow Ahinsaa (Non-Violence) and allowed Muslims (Asuras) to follow Hinsaa (Violence)? \\\\\\\\\\\ Swamy Vivekananda has said, “Where there is struggle, where there is rebellion, there is the sign of life, there consciousness is manifested.” 000000000