Date: 22 Dec 2011


Thank you for your "spot on" assessment of Hindusthan's dark future under the draconian hammer of Hindu-bashing "Congress (Italy&Islam)+Dynasty". \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ You have made a most revealing comment:\\\\\\\\\\\\ "The situation for Hindus is worse than under Aurangzeb. At least then they were fighting for their honour and motherland." One couldn't agree with you more! Absolutely spot on! \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Now we see even the Marathas, Jats, Gorkhas , Tamils and Sikhs co-operating with, and defending, the ENEMY day and night. To cap it all, the Rajputs are ALL wearing "glass bangles". Hindu women and girls in dozens of towns and villages from Karachi to Gilgit, like those in CHITOD, had to commit "JOHAR" in 1947. Even the gallant Armed Forces did not fight for them or Bharat, but for Dynasty. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ We have made another discovery: The word "ENEMY" does not exist in the Hindu vocabulary. It has not been used for ANY invader and killer since 712 AD. EVER SINCE, it is the ENEMY who has been ruling, bashing, insulting, killing and degrading us, on our own territory, CONTINOUSLY. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Scriptures, even Sri Guru Granth Sahib, composed in the thick of PERSECUTION during the rule of BABUR, AKBAR and SHAH JEHAN, when the last drop of pride in Hindu body was being drained off, did not refer to the MOHAMMEDANS as the enemy. Instead, the concept "Sarkar Mai Baap" replaced the word "Enemy". In 1947 the word for NEHRU was "chacha" (Uncle), not TRAITOR. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Nowhere else on earth can we see a thorough conditionaing in such definitive, conclusive, final and permanent manner. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ When the Muslims struck in 1947, devastating vast territories, doing total ethnic cleansing while murdering, looting, raping and burning, none of them was called "enemy". In fact the impossible took place. Our top leader, Gandhi, was chanting "Hindu Muslim BHAI BHAI" louder than ever as if looking his own death in the eye.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ What about our enemies? Does one have to tell a MUSLIM who his enemy is? You get his answeer before the question is complete: "KAFIRS, HINDUS, PAGANS, NON-BELIEVES." And all these words mean US HINDUS!\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Had it been ANY of these 51 ISLAMIC republics, Sonia would be chased out with loud howls, "ENEMY OUT!" Had it been any CHRISTAN country from EUROPE to the USA, UK, AUSTRALIA and LATIN AMERICA, we could NOT see an "Abdul Kalam" in the President's seat.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ LOOK AT THE SIKHS who do not know who the enemy is. Even a child knows that Lahore and Nankana Sahib are OCCUPIED by the MUSILMS. Yet these Muslims are "brothers". Pakistani Muslims are seen happily eating free food in Gurdwars along with the Sikh sangats in Bharat. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ In 1984 Mrs MAIMUNA BEGUM had her golden opportunity to attack Harimandir Sahib (Golden Temple) to kill hundreds. Later her son, Rajiv KHAN. a convert to ISLAM and later to CHRISTIANITY, did what comes naturally to the ENEMY. Comparing the Sikhs to dry leaves he encouraged the killers and murderers. The "secular" govdernment did not find it necessary to catch and hang the criiminals. Sikhs have neither called him "enemy" nor even used his mother's correct name: MAIMUNA BEGUM \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ There can be NO struggle or fight for FREEDOM if we HIndus (and Sikhs) have NO enemy. Perpetual slavery of the HINDU nation is guaranteed. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 22.12.11 ============== In a message dated 22/12/2011 14:05:13 GMT Standard Time, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\k writes:\\\\\\\\\\ This is the most possible assessment what Shri Kalam did when he was President. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ India has been under foreign and minority rule since 712 A.D. first under Muslims and then under Christians from Europe[ Denmark, Portugal, France and United Kingdom]. and now since Aug 1947 Congressled by last Englishman JLN and his nasty dynasty.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ This truth we all must accept only then there is a possibility to change the present Christian- Muslim -Congress rule in India.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Hindus have no tomorrow- no future because they are not in decision making under all are slaves of secularism and Sonia who has turned them as spoes persons of Congress.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The situation for Hindus is worse than under Aurangjeb at least then they were fighting for their honour and motherland.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Hindus are not in the equation the fate of India is with Muslims and Christians according to present situation Shri \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ----------------------\ Subject: ABDUL KALAM'S WISE MOVE \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ABDUL KALAM, A SHREWD MUSLIM.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Former President Abdul Kalam, adored, even worshipped, by the Hindus as the champion of secularism, saved Broken Bharat (BB) for MOHAMMED. How?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ We may not know or even realise that the HINDUS, collectively, are NO factor in the ongoing struggle for the domination of TERRITORY (what is left of India) any more.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Those who know our past and present can easily do projection into the future and see that the Hindus, who already lie “crushed” under the foot of a “Foreign Female, Congress & Dynasty” will be wiped out eventually in what is left of “Akhand Bharat”, or become slaves once again. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The next one thousand years will be like our past one thousand years. A confirmation of this theory was the utmost ease with which one third of India was surrendered unconditionally to the enemy in 1947 (i.e., went missing in the map just like that, not even “for a song”!). \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ That precious TERRITORY has never been recalled or mentioned by Parliament or Prime Minister of Bharat though they fully support the Palestinians’ right and fight to recover territory from Israel. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ With the Hindus (unable to raise the Temple in Ayodhya or return to Srinagar) are conclusively eliminated from the power struggle who will be left to dominate the rest of our territory? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ There is no doubt that the final battle for (the Rest of) Hindusthan will be fought between the Christians and the Muslims. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Knowing this key fact, ex President Abdul Kalam kept Sonia-Maino-Mussolini-“Gandhi” away from the prime mInister’s chair since she would have greatly boosted the Christian side (through suppression of Islam and conversion of Hindus to Christianity). \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Abdul Kalam’s strategic vision on behalf of his fellow Muslims (NOT secularism or Hindus) was a shrewd strategic move that transferred Power unexpectedly to Manmohan Singh. \\\\\\\\\\\\\ The question may arise in the mind of some doubting Toms, “How could Abdul Kalam assess the strategy of future India in such a manner?” Well, did he not see the easy conquest of West Punjab and East Bengal when a Hindu would have fought more energetically even for his “dhoti” or “langoti”. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Did he not know in his heart that a manly nation would have “solved” the Kashmir PROBLEM by repealing Article 370 of Constitution? Did he also not know that the “constitutional status of each and every Mohammedan, INCLUDING HIS OWN, in “Broken Bharat” SINCE PARTITION was that of the ENEMY? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Finally did he not know that across the length and breadth of Hindusthan the Hindus could NOT find a single man more suitable than him, a MUSLIM? \\\\\\\\\\\\ ANY COMMENT? ----------- STEP MOTHER & GENUINE MOTHER? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Most Hindus, ignorant fools, do not hesitate in calling Italian born Catholic Sonia the “Rashtramaata” of Bharat. But is she a genuine mother or a step mother? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ To these children of soil she is more than a genuine mother the way their own real mothers are neglected while all praises and presents are lavished on Sonia. It was also the case when our people saw a FOREIGN bride coming to India with the Prime Minister’s son. \\\\\\\\\\\\\ The native girls lost all value and the number of DOWRY DEATHS increased astronomically. Bharat has sacrificed TENS OF THOUSANDS of her own daughters who could not win the hearts of their INFERIORITY COMPLEX ridden indigenous (native) Hindu young men. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ It is the same story with the fall in esteem of Hindu boys in the eyes of Hindu girls who adore as their heroes the “Khans” of Bollywood while the Hindu young men play non-glamorous subsidiary roles. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ANY COMMENT? ------------ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 21 Dec 11 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 000000000 =