Date: 09 Feb 2012


There are a couple of regrets about India, CIVIL & MILITARY, and we do not know when the negative effects will come to the fore. A ship may sail on for a long time with a tiny leak in its hull but ultimately it must sink. At present the superior CIVIL authority does not seem to realise or even care about this. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ In arrogance or lack of interest, the SUPREME COMMANDER is refusing to listen to the ex-servicemen, even to receive the medals they are returning in protest and frustration. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The first symptom is the mis-match between those who must obey (the armed forces) and those who command (the civil authority). While the former are meticulously disciplined, brave and honest to the core, the later are just the opposite- opportunists, thoroughly corrupt scoundrels, and behave with blind obedience to ONE unscrupulous power hungry dynasty- all the way from Nehru through daughter, grandson, down to Priyenka and Rahul.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The first great retreat (WITHDRAWAL) of 1947 when we withdrew from the entire Western frontier, from Gilgit to Karachi, was at the behest of the CIVIL, i.e., POLITICAL, authority. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The order to the INDIAN armed forces NOT to defend the INDIAN territory was illegal, immoral and anti national since it was their primary duty to defend the frontiers (east and west) and shoot the traitor (Nehru). \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ In the same year the hostile treatment of the truly and genuinely patriotic army of Bharat, known as AZAD HIND FAUJ, that could have been the NUCLEUS of free India's army, was indicative of NEHRU's inner thinking. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ He apparently respected the sanctity of the OATH of loyalty taken by them to the British Crown while deliberately ignoring the fact that the Oath of loyalty towards England, the alien (FOREIGN OCCUPYING) POWER was in itself invalid against the Oath of loyalty to INDIA that was administered by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose towards our enslaved Motherland INDIA. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Those two men showed the extreme contrast between the one who was an Imperial Lackey, a secret enemy agent, and the other, the true honourable and patriotic Son of Bharat. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Nehru regarded the Oath of loyalty by INDIAN "jawans" towards the British King as sacrosanct but then apparently demanded the departure of the British from India! Looks very suspicious about his core loyalty. Doesn't it?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The conclusion is that Nehru was PARTIAL to the British and hostile to Netaji, his army (INA), and the cause (freedom of India). Had Nehru been ELIMINATED then and there, not only India would have emerged as "AKHAND" but the armed forces would also have escaped all the DEMOTION, DEGRADATION and HOSTILITY from the civil masters who fear a coup any time just like the BANDIT who fears the police knocking on his door any time.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ We saw the dark hand of the civil overlords when they went to UNO to ask for cease-fire in Kashmir when our Jawans were so close to the goal of OUSTING all the invaders from the soil of the State. and later when throwing Secularism out of window Prime Minister Maimuna Begum (aka Indira Gandhi) returned OUR OWN territory that had become East Pakistan 25 years earlier due to her father's high treason and love of Islam that was also shared by Bapu MK Gandhi. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The secret aim of Operation "Blue Star" was to hurt the feelings of the Sikhs, backbone of the Indian armed forces until then, across the whole world, not just to arrest one Bhindranwale. The aim was achieved in offending and alienating the Sikhs- all the Sikhs.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The nation ought to watch out the CIVIL authority whose rot may also INFECT the fine Indian armed forces who do not live, and operate, in a separate compartment or vacuum. ============================ 000000000