Date: 04 May 2012


MUSLIM MARRIAGE (BELOW)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Hindus must seriously think of the IMPLICATIONS for our own daughters who are "legitimately" seduced, married or raped by MUSLIMS of any age, even those “rascals” already married to one, two or three women. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The Indian or Hindu MORAL system clashes head on with the Islamic system of belief and practice as we see below.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Even after living with us for a thousand years, when the chance came to “MUTILATE” India and STAB us from TWO sides (East and West), our Muslim FELLOW CITIZENS did not waste a second. The result of their TREASON & TREACHERY is PAKISTAN. In one second they rose to SMASH Bapu Gandhi's "Akhand Bharat" and massacred over a MILLION innocent Hindus as "collateral" damage. Their PRIMARY motivation was to capture LAND ("Dharti Maata") as much as possible and to SHRINK our own living space on earth as much as possible.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ What is shocking, not just amazing, is the fact that the HINDUS (perennial victims as per Koran, Hadis & Sharia) still look at the Muslims in PARTITIONED INDIA with fraternal eyes. Who put molten iron in our eyes to blind us? Who took out the word "ENEMY" from our mentaliy, mind and psyche? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Who stopped us even asking, “Are there NO implications of treating the ENEMY like brothers? Should we not wait for the insurgency to die down in Kashmir and some voices rising in Pakistan and “Bogusdesh”, to come back to Mother India, even to prove that one could trust TODAY'S Muslims like Abdul Kalam, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Dr. Farooq Abdullah, Salman Khursheed, Saif Ali Khan and Shah Rukh Khan?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ We should NOT forget that the MUSLIMS living all over India on 1st January 1947 were also referred to as "today'/s Muslims" by our parents and grandparents (and those of us who were alive then)! How can we forgive ourselves for the CRIME of ignoring such fundamental and vital facts simply to go out of our way to call one “Bhai”? \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Why have the Hindus given leave to their senses- even the Will to survive, when there is a fierce CONTEST going on all the time for the “TERRITORY of Hindus”? We ought to take heed from the fate of NATIVE Americans who have LOST all territory and are confined to Reservations! The Buddhists of Afghanistan lost all territory to the intolerant savages from Arabia and have become EXTINCT (like the Hindus in most of Pakistan and Bogusdesh.. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Up to now the Hindus have not shown themselves as the MAJORITY community, dominating their territory on their own patch like the Majority communities in the USA, Germany, France, Australia and Austria where the Muslims have to BEG for permission to enter and resort to all sorts of tricks and means including seducing the ignorant gullible girls from poor countries in Eastern Europe in order to obtain 'permanent right to live' in Europe. In Bharat we are so used to “BLEEDING & being BASHED” that we do not notice the ISLAMIC “WOLVES” that have dug their teeth deep in the flesh of Hindu BODY, or of Hindusthan, and will not let go till the “Rest of India”, too, falls down to be DEVOURED like West Punjab, East Bengal and North Kashmir. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 4 May 12.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \In a message dated 03/05/2012 23:14:50 GMT Daylight Time, \\\\\\\\\\\\.com writes:\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Saudi Cleric Issues Fatwa Defending Pedophilia as ‘Marriage’ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\Posted on July 27, 2011 at 1:15am by Tiffany Gabbay \It is difficult to imagine defending pedophilia at all, let alone issuing a religious decree officially condoning it through the act of marriage. Yet that is what one Saudi cleric has reportedly done by issuing a fatwa defending Muslim “child marriage” or, pedophilia. Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a cleric in Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, has reportedly issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\According to FrontPage:\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Appearing in Saudi papers on July 13, the fatwa complains that “Uninformed interference with Sharia rulings by the press and journalists is on the increase, posing dire consequences to society, including their interference with the question of marriage to small girls who have not reached maturity, and their demand that a minimum age be set for girls to marry.” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\Fawzan insists that nowhere does Sharia set an age limit for marrying girls: like countless Muslim scholars before him, he relies on Koran 65:4, which discusses marriage to females who have not yet begun menstruating (i.e., are prepubescent) and the fact that Muhammad, Islam’s role model, married Aishawhen she was 6-years-old, “consummating” the marriage—or, in modern parlance, raping her—when she was 9.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ FP reports that the point of the fatwa is not so much that girls as young as 9 can follow Muhammad’s example and have sexual intercourse, but that there is in fact no age limit at all for the children to be taken as wives. FP asserts the only question posed by the cleric is whether the child is literally physically capable of “bearing the weight” of her new husband, or, molester. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Fawzan reportedly illustrates this point by quoting Ibn Batal’s authoritative religious text Sahih Bukhari:\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The ulema [Islam’s interpreters] have agreed that it is permissible for fathers to marry off their small daughters, even if they are in the cradle. But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men. And their capability in this regard varies based on their nature and capacity. Aisha was 6 when she married the prophet, but he had sex with her when she was 9 [i.e., when she was deemed capable].\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Fawzan then reportedly concludes his fatwa with the warning: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\“It behooves those who call for setting a minimum age for marriage to fear Allah and not contradict his Sharia, or try to legislate things Allah did not permit. For laws are Allah’s province; and legislation is his excusive right, to be shared by none other. And among these are the rules governing marriage.” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\FP reminds us that Fawzan is not the first Islamic leader to legitimize pedophilia in Islam and that the former grand mufti of Saudi Arabia himself also supported “child-marriage,” citing the Quran and Sunna as proof.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\Needless to say many young girls are falling victim such rulings. FP relates the circumstances surrounding the horrific death of a 13 year old girl who was reportedly raped and killed by her husband:\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Recall, for instance, the 13-year-old girl who died while her much older husband was copulating with her (it was later revealed that, due to her reluctance, he was tying her up and “raping” her—as if there is another way to describe sex with children); or the 12-year-old who died giving birth to a stillborn; or the 10-year-old who made headlines by hiding out from her 80-year-old “husband.” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\But there are likely numerous other instances that go unreported as the victims’ fear bringing any attention that might result in further abuse, or even their murder.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Where are the human rights abuse investigations at times like these?\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The picture above features a Muslim cleric who was jailed for marrying and having intercourse with a 12-year old he took as his bride.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ The pictures in this article have been updated for clarity. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ --- On Thu, 5/3/12, XXXXXXXXXXXX<\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ wrote: Re: Muslims have only one caste - SUPER CASTE ... Join and enjoy dignity ... No more licking the feet of high caste morons ... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012, 2:21 PM Muslims will put up all kinds of excuses but will never admit that it is wrong for a fifty three year old man to marry a six year old girl, daughter of his best friend and one of his first few followers. And then ask his own adopted son to divorce his wife so that the old man can marry her. \\\\\\\\\\\ 000000000