BEFORE PARTITION AND NOW
August 15th is around the corner. Certainly like all 'Independence days' before this time too usual platitudes will be heard. It is unlikely that any one placed on high pedestal will ever remember or recall tragedy amounting to holocaust then, by now a completed genocide, Hindus have suffered on that day, on days preceding it and in the years following it. So by now in millions lot more than 6 million in gas chambers in Europe, have vanished into thin air without a trace with no monuments so that even memories will be wiped out just as men, women, children in millions on that fateful day. Sardar Patel rightly observed on Aug 15, 1947, that there was no joy in the faces of people of India for their independence.
Despite pie in the sky rewards promised, expected by the gullible fanatics who stabbed their neighbours, fellow countrymen to carve India to pieces to get what is supposed to be a heaven, Jannat, on this side of firmament now stand sorely disappointed. There was no joy in their faces too on August 14,1947, when Pakistan came into existence courtesy of tripod -British who blessed the idea of dividing the country, Moslem league which demanded it at sword point, Gandhi-Nehru who conceded it. For that matter there is no joy on faces of any body of Pakistan all these years to date and in future as well as far as we can see. Two nation theory was a lie, only a lawyer like Jinnah could have argued for it then and remains a fraud now. Victims include people of Pakistan themselves who are treated no better than chattel by privileged few.
No body elected any of the troika to vivisect a living breathing what is to be a vibrant nation that robbed the joy of people just emerging into freedom after centuries of struggle. None apologized either instead were still pouring gasoline on burning cinders, lighting up dying embers of bigotry of earlier Mughal era either for the sake of appeasement earlier and secularism later. Hence the product, Pakistan keeps attacking India still.
India true to her spirits, ageless, timeless civilization is emerging as a self confident nation alright which at that time of first day of independence was not expected by many worthies especially in the west to even remain intact without further partitions. British thought they took care of temerity of India demanding freedom with creation of Pakistan to keep India down, along with leaving another big mess in the hands of new leaders by having India further divided into more 562 princely states.
Provinces and Princely states of India (Twilight of a New Era ...
Not just UK but also in US also the same impression about questionable viability of India was created possibly through mutual confabulations. Nixon thought India will break up after Nehru, so he did not hesitate to bring it about by his gun boats, encouraged by his side kick Kissinger. Pakistan thought with the gifted Patton tanks, Sabre jets they would be marching in Delhi flying green flag over red fort.
However all these shenanigans especially invention of Pakistan, awarding terror with a state-Islamic State proved to be a Frankenstein monster for nations in the west especially UK and US as well as rest of Europe, and Pakistan continues to remain as threat to India much like Ghazni or Ghori whose names adorn Pak's missiles obtained from N Korea, another not so friendly nation towards West or Western civilization.
It is thus fortunate for both western and world civilization all attempts to bring about further disintegration of India have failed, instead the 'state that never was state' or an 'army looking for a state' is the one that is coming apart at its seams while India is marching from strength to strength.
On this August 15, 2016 too as usual besides paying tributes to various achievements of India since independence, or praises to alleged father of nation adnauseum, hope somebody remembers and mentions at the same time tragedy of partition that took place during and around the time of first independence day along with self confessed Himalayan blunders of leaders on whom greatness was thrust.
Please see personal accounts and feelings of two victims of partition. Indian National Congress passed the resolution for 'Purna Swaraj' total independence, in Karachi. Year later the same Congress endorsed Gandhi - Mountbatten decision reversing its resolution opposing partition. Hence Karachi is now in different nation. Only nation that was new, not India which is as ancient as mountains, rivers like Himalayas or Ganges. So who was whose 'father' - not India's.
Any way whether one has reverence while others have revulsion towards Gandhis, Nehrus, it is a matter of fact that creation of Pakistan served no interests of either India or Pakistan, neither helped Hindus nor Muslims of India.
India is a nation emerging into greatness, rightly seeks a place as permanent member of august international bodies like Security council of United nations. Is it not then incumbent on her and the people there in hence to undo the mischief of, Himalayan blunders of bygone years? Even if India out of magnanimity settles for status quo, shrugging shoulders saying let bygones be bygones, events like 3 wars, and continuing proxy war will not let India live in peace. India good or bad has tried peace process that was one sided all these years since first day of independence August 15 1947. Since then to coming August 15, 2016, 69 years have gone by. Just how long, just how many more coming generations should continue to be burdened with same malady of being subjected proxy war with terrorism by a state that was never a state?
To repeat a well know adage, doing the same thing but expecting a different result is called insanity. Fortunately, from British earlier, subsequently from Gandhi-Pseudo-Gandhi led regimes as well India became free now. So time now to evolve a different strategy sans cricket matches, Samjhauta expresses, to unsettle settled unstable arrangement of 'two nations' where only one should be as intended by divine, by nature for eons, and as well as by humans for thousands upon thousands of years so that soon coming one August 15th Independence day of Bhaarath can be celebrated in Karachi where resolution to obtain Purna Swaraj was passed. Certainly then also we can see tears in the eyes of people of united India, but they will be tears of joy.
The Partition of India
India at present
India before partition and after reunification .
before partition reasons for partition in the end of the
India before partition and after reunification
Posted by: G V Chelvapilla - email@example.com - August 5, 2016
Please see many facts and stories on partition at
Showing results for Partition of india and Pakistan in 1947
Murder, rape and shattered families: 1947 Partition Archive effort - Dawn
Mar 13, 2015 - Murder, rape and shattered families: 1947 Partition Archive effort underway ... Millions of Muslims migrated from India to Pakistan. Partition ...
Partition of India and Pakistan: The Rape of Women On An Epic Scale...
Aug 16, 2013 - The partition of British India in August 1947 not only created two new independent nations, India and Pakistan, but also resulted in one of the ...
And also see movies based on partition.
BEFORE PARTITION & NOW
“Hindus are exploiting the Muslims and have made us poor and at their mercy. They have been our slaves in the past and we cannot bear the thought of them ruling over us. There will be no Muslim left in India in 20 years’ time if we don’t have our own sovereign country,” he used to say. “But when we get Pakistan we will have all the natural resources of the land and the zeal of Islam to develop our country to the standard of France and England in 20 years’ time. Every Pakistani will have a house, running hot and cold water, western style toilets and plenty to eat.”
What he said, appealed to all the “JAAHILS” and they united as one man across the sub continent. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was like real brother to Mohammed Ali Jinnah, a fellow barrister from London and the Muslim leader, who regarded himself superior and separate from the Hindus. It was fashionable in ruling circles then to befriend the Muslims and loathe the Hindus.
Nehru lived the life style of an emperor and behaved and spoke like our British masters. He was neither for the Hindus nor for Hindustan. It was quite obvious then but Imperial power and propaganda by media blinded us to reality and to what was about to take place.
What was noticeable was complete apathy of Hindus in Delhi and total ignorance of Hindus in UP, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. While the Muslims took out frenzied processions through towns and cities across northern India, provocatively shouting "Pakistan Zindabaad!", the Hindus remained placid, calm and in "Om Shanti Shanti" mode- unconcerned and mere onlookers. Not even the thought of impending massacres roused them to counter demonstrations. Many did not know what was going to happen to East Bengal and Sindh.
As the inter communal tensions grew, with the British watching the heat and "tamaasha" in safety from above, many Hindu families, feeling insecure and uncertain, thought of locking up their homes and going away to hills or relatives in Hindu majority States (Kangra hills and Hindu princely states being the favourite!) and then return to the new Islamic country to live in peace! How naïve and ignorant we were about the destructive Ideology of Islam! (Are we any better today?).
None thought that they would never return to their homes ever again.
The British rulers, knowing that Hindustan could become a world power with all that land mass and natural resources, decided to fragment the sub continent. Thereby they served two causes. Firstly pushing our economic recovery by many decades. and secondly. creating a zone of hostility in South Asia in order to sell arms and weapons to us to remain at loggerheads for ever.
Nehru was Islam’s biggest asset in what he was to do further: He, along with "meekly go along" Mahatma / Bapu Gandhi, made sure that NO Muslim was asked to leave for his Pakistan and secondly he enacted a Constitution to enslave the Hindus again. Anyone who abused a Mohammed was to go to jail and spend the rest of his life there. Muslim had to be protected at all costs. Muslim became someone special. Muslim had to be pampered, pleased and appeased for the sake of peace in Hindusthan.
Further concessions were: never to mention PARTITION, never to hold any commemoration ceremony, never to designate a “Dhaka Memorial Day” or “Multan Memorial Day” and never to ask for a Memorial to be built for the two millions dead and 15 million who were forced out of their homes in 1947.
That is where our country is in LIMBO today with the added friction and heat over KASHMIR. Pygmies are facing giant size problems that plague us today and lie ahead.
Please share your priceless memories of those days. They are invaluable for those who were born after Partition.
WHAT WILL WE CELEBRATE ON 15 AUGUST?
On Friday, August 5, 2016, RSingh305 via Patriots Forum
"PANCHSHEEL" OF NEHRU, 1947.
TWO HISTORIC SURRENDES ON ONE DAY
1. The date was August 15. On that day in 1945 & 1947, the largest two countries in Asia, both non Muslim and non Christian but one Buddhist (LION) and one Hindu (ELEPHANT), met with their doom by design (of Western Imperialism). Was the choice of date intentional or a coincidence? We need not try to guess the answer when the facts speak for themselves.
Initially the date of Independence of India was fixed as April 1948 but then advanced to August the previous year? Why?
Lord louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, who passed on his CONTEMPT of Hindus to mentally unstable Jawaharlal Nehru, infatuated by his wife Edwina, decided to link Japan and India by humiliating them on the same date. So he chose August 15 for the unconditional surrender of India since two years earlier on the same date, Japan had signed her unconditional surrender to the Allies. But remarkably the similarity ends abruptly here.
India CELEBRATES the illusion (MIRAGE) of her Independence on that day while honourable Japan has nothing to hide and COMMEMORATES the DEAD of Hiroshima (August 6) and Nagasaki (August 9).
We believe our Bharat should show guts and courage and acknowledge her “mutilation” by her indigenous Muslims, led by Mohammed Ali Jinnah, and, like the Japanese, We, too, should COMMEMORATE our DEAD (of Partition) on August 15 every year. The great advantage of doing so will be a nation that is aware of the past, and PREPARED for the future (i.e., next onslaught).
We request PM Shri Modi: “Kindly take the nation out of cowardly & deceptive “make-believe” that we got Independence and then start praising Nehru and Gandhi sky high, but rather be brave and realist and acknowledge the fact that we “bought” our Freedom from Foreign rule only after surrendering nearly one third of India to the enemy who had grown up and lived among us in a land that was praised by poet Mohammed Iqbal when he sang, “Saare Jehan se achcha Hindusthan hamaara!”
Esteemed readers, please post your views on what the Modi “Sarkar” will call “Independence” on August 15 next!
2. NEHRU’S PANCHSHEEL*
(*“Panchsheel” was the Agreement among Asia’s five countries in Jakarta in 1955 to ensure peace and prosperity in the region. For this Nehru and Nasser took great credit.)
PANCH SHEEL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Principles_of_Peaceful_Coexistence
Question for all Hindus in Hindusthan: “Why should we “celebrate” the “Murder” of Mother (India)?”
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION
(“PANCH SHEEL” OF NEHRU)
MUSLIM AGGRESSION bore fruit. They succeeded in occupying one third of India overnight, and in exterminating the Non Muslims (i.e., HINDUS) living there within weeks. HINDU RESPONSE was Surrender (unconditional), and RUN (for life).
Response by Indian Armed Forces: ZERO. They, too, packed up their kit & equipment in utmost haste and vanished from their own territory that they were supposed to defend to the “last man and last round”.
In 1940 we had All-India Congress Party in league with All-India Muslim League that was suddenly thrown into limelight by the British rulers who believed in the policy of “Divide & Rule”. The acknowledged the Muslims living in India as the "SECOND NATION".
It was the separatist "second nation" (Muslims) who had thought of creating an Islamic country within India as early as 1936 when a few Muslim students in London coined the word “Pakistan”. To the discredit of Hindu leaders none took a serious note of the new destructive idea that started growing rapidly like poisonous weed among the Indian Muslims. After the end of World War 2 in August 1945 the seed had grown full height into a poisonous tree.
While senile “Bapu” MK Gandhi lived in his own make-believe unrealistic world of “Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai”, it was cunning Jawaharlal Nehru who stepped in the vacuum and began to seriously represent India at the so-called “Independence” talks that ended in the surrender of (Akhand) Bharat.
Nehru’s conduct needs close scrutiny. That he never mentioned to Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the leader of Indian Muslims, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall,”, is no more a mystery. Nor did he ever accuse Mr Jinnah of High Treason or warn of the consequences.
Nehru was literally the “Son of a Mohammed” himself, and his job was tough and dangerous: to destroy the Hindu nation from within by agreeing to break up India while at the same time projecting himself as a champion of Secularism and an indomitable freedom fighter.
Hindus have never dared to look at their rulers with a critical eye since the first Hindu critic had his eyes gouged out before being beheaded in public by the Mohammedan invaders from Arabia in 712 AD. Thereafter it was the Muslims and the Christians who shot and hanged the critics of regime in their thousands. Thus a tradition set in, to blindly follow the one in front like the sheep approaching the edge of the cliff.
How wide awake could the Hindu nation have been in 1940’s can be judged even today in 2016 AD, from their refusal to discuss “Partition” in the open, their blind faith in Nehru’s treacherous “Hindu bashing” Constitution and their tolerance of the corrupt.
Nehru himself had described the state of awareness of the Hindus more accurately than anyone else. When an aide pointed out the likelihood of a patriot firing a shot at him if he agreed to Partition, he quipped, “Hindus will not only accept Partition but also celebrate it!” And when the aide suggested "Referendum", Nehru replied, "Who consults the cattle?" The aide was left speechless.
“Haven’t we sometimes wondered as to what the terms and conditions of Partition really were?”
“We wish there was even one!”, replied a Hindu professor of history.
“And what would that have been if there was to be just ONE condition?”
“EXPEL THE LOT- lock, stock and Koran, from Partitioned India,” said his wife instantly as if by reflex action.
But there were conditions, though not from Nehru or Gandhi, the sons of soil, but from the leader of the MUSLIMS, Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
Offensive and preposterous though they were, our perennial ENEMY met with no resistance, challenge or fight from the HINDU side.
Neither Nehru nor Gandhi mentioned exchange of population or Referendum. Neither demanded time to comprehend the implications of Partition for the Muslims in Bharat and the Hindus who would be trapped in Pakistan, or, merely to think it over.
The conditions that were then dictated were fully backed and endorsed by Britain, our colonial master, and, astonishingly, accepted by Gandhi, Nehru and their “All-India Congress Party” that claimed to represent ALL the Indians throughout the country-from Kashmir to Kerala and from Khyber to Chittagong.
“All-India Hindu Maha Sabha”, our counterpart of “All-India Muslim League”, never showed up even for one second!
Demoralised Hindu & Sikh leaders, who became even more self-negating and self-sacrificing “secular goats” under Gandhi’s influence, held their breath while cancer eaten “skeleton” of Mohammed Ali Jinnah proclaimed his conditions, one by one. (Jinnah died an agonising death in Karachi on 11 September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan's creation. We ought to reflect on his companions in Hell!)
At that critical juncture in our history Jawaharlal Nehru was correctly noticed by some smart Hindus to be the illegitimate son of a Muslim, the secret agent of Anglo-Islamic Axis, who had stood solidly on the side of Jinnah ever since the "Pakistan Resolution" was passed in Lahore on March 23rd, 1940.
Nehru never uttered a single word to support “Akhand Bharat” as if our ancient land of Vedas was a mere rag bag. With Nehru turned into an enemy, the full brunt of fighting Partition fell on “Bapu” Gandhi who had already shown his total commitment to non-violence, conciliation, appeasement and, therefore, unconditional surrender.
This put the Hindus in extremely vulnerable and dangerous position. Mohammed Ali Jinnah had his Pakistan in his hand and our Hindusthan under his foot.
Emboldened by British support, Jinnah’s dictation to all the Hindu leaders seemed like one determined cat addressing the vast assembly of mice.
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION:
1. LOCAL (not overall) MAJORITY. “Wherever we are in majority that territory will belong to our Rasul Allah Mohammed of Mecca in perpetuity. You will surrender all that land unconditionally.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru, listening meekly.
“For those territories that you surrender we shall write up, and enforce, ISLAMIC Constitution that will be based on the teachings of KORAN. We shall treat all the KAFIRS, i.e., Non Muslims, as prescribed in that Book.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, trembling while listening.
3. HOLOCAUST OF HINDUS.
We reserve the right to carry out total ethnic cleansing of Hindus and Sikhs by murdering, abducting, raping millions and expelling tens of millions from their homes, degrading them in our ISLAMIC Pakistan by denying them EQUALITY with the Muslims who will be free to rape a non-Muslim female and if she complains, she will be required to produce FOUR male witnesses to support her accusation. You will watch like the sheep in abattoir your fellow Hindus killed in Kashmir, East Bengal, West Punjab, Sindh, even Uganda and Fiji, but do nothing while silently waiting for your own turn. In the case of all mixed marriages, the non-Muslim spouse will embrace Islam at once, or face DEATH.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, listening.
4. SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR MUSLIMS IN “BROKEN” BHARAT
“Thou shalt not touch the whiskers of a Mohammed in Hindusthan. Your government will undertake to safeguard life and property of each and every Muslim citizen while we reserve the right to do ethnic cleansing in accordance with the Will of Allah. In cinemas NO Hindu actor will be seen doing any love scene or dance with a Muslim actress while Muslim actors will have full freedom to dance, kiss, play, strip & bare (naked) any Hindu actress.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray, hurry up. We need to start breathing.” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, holding their breath.
5. TERRITORIAL ENCROACHMENT. Finally let it be clear upon you that any territory or land that is once under the foot of Mohammed (i.e., “Islamic”), will belong to MOHAMMED of MECCA in perpetuity. Any territory or land that is once ours will never be yours. Accordingly, not only West Pakistan but also East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and any part of Kashmir captured by us, will remain ISLAMIC for ever.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Thank you,” said Gandhi and Nehru, mighty relieved that the Islamic “PANCHSHEEL” had come to an end and they could breathe normally once again.
YES, the lives of our despicable cowardly “netas” had been spared though MILLIONS of ordinary citizens of Bharat lost theirs as a direct result of “buying peace” from the Devils.
It was like Chamberlain’s “Peace with Honour” agreement with HITLER in 1938. Hindusthan, known as “Bharat Mata”, or “Mother India”, shrank in size and acquired her most disgusting map outline ever. Nehru was an accomplice while Gandhi watched it all silently.
Dear honourable & patriotic citizens of Bharat and NRI’s across the world, this then is the Truth, nothing else but the TRUTH, behind that word “Independence” that the Government of India, and all those who form part of the EVIL AXIS of “Italy, Islam, (Nehru) Dynasty & their despicable Hindu camp followers” celebrate year after year on August 15.
It is up to us (and our genuine leaders) to encourage the entire brainwashed and demoralised nation to become bold and brave in order to revive & re-state our stand on “Akhand Bharat”.
It is up to us to open our eyes and see the Truth. It is up to us to demand a TRIAL of Jinnah, Nehru and Gandhi for HIGH TREASON. Such trial can never be time barred like the trial of Bofors Chor.
It is up to the PEOPLE of India to unite and then become a MIGHTY FORCE to reckon with. Shedding the traits of “jackals” but acquiring the guts of “lions” we all should step forward and exterminate the anti Hindu, anti secular and anti national “vermin” who have been fooling our great nation of one billion since times immemorial.
Partition was the DEATH of our cherished “Akhand Bharat” (Divine Mother, Hindusthan). Who on earth is such despicable scum (“ZALEEL”) to “celebrate” the death of his mother? Accordingly, on August 15 next, there should be nationwide BLACK FLAG rallies and black ribbons to remind us of the worst defeat and surrender in our history, and then to rejuvenate the supine nation to recover the surrendered territory and march towards the goal of “RAAM RAAJYA”.
It was MK Gandhi’s innermost yearning as a self-negating, self-confessed coward, to see strong & manly Mogul Raj re-established in Bharat after the departure of the "British Lion" so that by paying Jezia tax the Hindus could “buy” their safety, and the safety of their virgin daughters, from the Muslim predators.
Gandhi was well known for his appeasing the Muslims and admiring his Muslim friends and hosts. That is why when his friend MA Jinnah demanded Pakistan in March 1940 Gandhi did not protest or go on “fast unto death” as he used to do so often over much more banal issues to "move the conscience" of the European rulers.
Isn’t it amazing that MK Gandhi, the "Father of Nation" did not take much notice of "Pakistan Resolution" passed in Lahore on 23 March 1940 that demanded five provinces outright, and the right to deal with the trapped Hindus in those provinces “as per Sharia”?
In traitor Jawaharlal Nehru, senile Gandhi had a ready made accomplice to realize his dream to see the Flag of Mohammed flying in Delhi as well as in Lahore.
Hindu leaders and intelligentsia are invited to THINK about the “Father of Nation” of Hindusthan who did not notice that India had GANGRENE and needed amputation of the affected limbs. After Partition India got CANCER that is spreading, and TERMINAL. What did India gain through her PARTITON?
WE MUST CONVEY TO OUR PEOPLE THAT ON 15TH AUGUST, WE DID NOT GET FREEDOM. IT WAS A MERE HAND OVER OF POWER TO THE CHOSEN JL NEHRU WHO WAS CLOSE TO THE BRITISH REGIME & A CRONY IN DISGUISE OF BEING A STAUNCH NATIONALIST.
THAT BOGUS PARTITION WAS AN EXCUSE TO SLAUGHTER COUNTLESS HINDUS, TAKE OVER THEIR HOMES, LANDS AND BUSINESSES, ABDUCT AND RAPE, CONVERT, SELL AND KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF GIRLS. IT WAS THE HOLOCAUST OF HINDUS, WORSE THAN EVEN THAT OF THE JEWS DURING WORLD WAR 2.
Hesitations in History—Or Shall We Say "Betrayal Of India"
From: D C Nath <
Date: Thu, Jun 16, 2016
We are aware M K Rasgotra, has been a Nehru-baiter.
When we saw the title, "Hesitations In History", we felt attracted to read the report on this written by one Swagato Ganguly on the edit page of “The Times Of India" of June 16, 2016. Swagtao has put this as, "All That Is Solid Melts".
Rasgotra has rightly described the history of J F Kennedy offering India to be a permanent member of the NSC and allowed that to go to China. This was crass betrayal of India's national interest by Nehru. Nehru's misplaced love for China was also reflected in the case accepting the Chinese hegemony over Tibet against the advice Sardar Patel. The rest is history.
The facts on Kennedy's offer are:
“US President John F Kennedy offered to help India detonate a nuclear device much before China did in 1964. But Indian PM Jawaharlal Nehru refused the offer. Rasgotra’s claim looks to me an entirely credible one. Kennedy was one of the most pro-India of US presidents who sought to empower democratic India vis-à-vis Maoist China, which he saw as a grave danger to the free world (the US seeks to assist India’s rise for similar strategic reasons today, to ensure China doesn’t call all the shots in Asia and to keep sea lanes open). Nehru, on the other hand, was enough of a pacifist to be vehemently against nuclear tests and nuclear weapons. He had fought the British to win Indian independence, and the UK and US were close allies (although Roosevelt did strongly intercede with Churchill to push Indian independence).”
Then what happened, instead, was that Pakistan managed to play both the US and China to diplomatically outmanoeuvre India for a long time. That ended with Pakistan’s military adventurism during the 1999 Kargil war, which convinced the US (though not China) that the Pakistani posture is a fundamentally dangerous and irresponsible one. However, Pakistan has strategically used 9/11 to claw back to some US favour.”
Swagato has further observed very correctly:
“Asian countries with close relationships to the US opened up their economies in the 1970s, enabling them to boom. Had India done the same it would have remained abreast with China, instead of falling behind till it’s become, today, only a tiny blip in Beijing’s rear view mirror. Eventually, Pakistan too would have given up its existential enmity with India and thrown in its hat to join the South Asian boom.”
Well, Friends, what Swagato has brought out and we have added, are unfortunate facts of history. We are paying the price for Nehru's follies. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been going door to door secure support to India's case for a seat in the NSC. China has been raising more and more trident voice against the Indian demand. It has recently gone on record that India's demand for a seat at the NSC has vitiated the security atmosphere in the region. What a spacious logic! What was ours, we are begging for that now. Whom shall we blame? Was not that a case of betrayal by Nehru, as stated by us in the the title.One lesson of history is that it is rather cruel. A final judgement of history on Nehru's place in Indian history is yet to be written.
D.C. Nath, (Former Spl. Director, IB), (President, Patriots’ Forum)
1) "In CWIHP Working Paper #76, "Not at the Cost of China: New Evidence Regarding US Proposals to Nehru for Joining the United Nations Security Council," author Anton Harder examines the controversy surrounding India's role in the United Nations Security Council in the 1950s. Using Indian archival material from the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, this paper shows that America's interest in seeing India join the Security Council was motivated by the emergence of the People's Republic of China as a regional power, and that this episode was an early example of the United States attempting to use the United Nations to further its own Cold War interests.
Anton Harder is a PhD candidate in the International History Department of the London School of Economics. His dissertation is on Sino-Indian relations from 1949-1962.
Click Here to Read "Not at the Cost of China" as a PDF.
- See more at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/not-the-cost-china-india-and-the-united-nations-security-council-1950#sthash.ZXU4LVkD.dpuf "
Hesitations in History—Or Shall We Say "Betrayal of India"
Sent: June 16,
Dear Sri D C Nath,
It was not John F Kennedy who offered Nehru, a permanent seat and membership in United Nations Security council but Dwight Eisenhower right at the start in 1950.
Though Nehru's acolytes even to date dispute that any such offer was ever made, record tells otherwise. Nehru also was on record in saying publicly according to reports that appeared more than half a century back, that he wanted China, a big country should get Permanent security council seat representing Asia ( as if India was a small country, well, he did make it smaller by agreeing to partition and then donating entire Himalayan frontier as well 'where no blade of grass grows' along with Aksai Chin to his bhais- be that as it may).
In any case certainly it was not JFK who made the offer. Kennedy was assassinated in Nov 22, 1963. Nehru passed away in May 1964.
Actually the offer to make a Atomic Bomb to India came from within India from Homi J Bhabha. (30 Oct 1909- 24 Jan 1966) He said he could make an Atomic bomb for Rs 30 Lakhs each. Nehru and Congress refused saying it is too expensive for a poor country like India. And about the same time a Congress party session was held in Guntur Andhra, presided by Kamaraj Nadar. The party spent Rs 90 lakhs. Soon after Homi J Bhaba passed away in Indian Airline flight over Alps when it met an 'accident'. Again be that as it may.
In both instances, UN security council permanent membership or India to have obtained status of Nuclear weapon state well before China did, India's interests were clearly compromised during most important formative years.
Posted by: firstname.lastname@example.org
WHAT WE MUST DO
From: vinod karnik
June 19, 2016
To Dear, respected Friends,
1. There are many valuable, interesting and educative e mails. I am specially referring to e nails informing
(a) Correct history of Bharat of the last 2000 years(b) How the majority of this country was treated badly and is being treated by the rulers so far .(c) the correct family background of Nehru dynasty, that they are Muslim and christens(d) How congress has ruined our country(e) how minority community is taking us for grated and their grand design for the future to make this country as Muslim country ,( learn from tenants of Muslim religion) in that their tacit support to the muslin terrorist organisation(f) How Hindus are foolish not to understand all this
2. However, the contents of such e mails are available to only 2 % of Hindu population. The reasons are (a)majority Hindus are poor, igonorant and not enough educated, and do not understand what we wish to convey to them.(b)do not have access to computer (c)they are still struggling for their daily livelihoods, hence their priorities are different.(e) the educated have failed to disseminate information to poor Hindus(f) the poor are lured by money and misinformed the real story by those who are opposed to Hindus, of what is correctly happening in this country(g) the attitude of majority educated Hindus is “indifferent” and “Sab Chalta hai”. They are ignorant of lurking danger to all Hindus.
3. The examples of WRONG perception of the Hindus are many, but few are quoted
(a) The majority of Hindus, still think that present Gandhi family are descendants of (Mahatma!!) M K Gandhi and therefore (like M K Gandhi) they can do no wrong (b) We, Hindus, still consider that MK Gandhi was equivalent to God and is Mahatma (c) Pundit Nehru, was not real Pundit, therefore highly learned Hindu. Being “Pundit” he could do no wrong. He is still considered as “Chacha”, a very affectionate and respected word, which shows relationship amongst Hindu family members, among Hindus, whereas Hindus are NOT aware that the Nehru family is Muslim, Nehru himself was manipulater, and womanizer. (d)Muslim religion stand for” baichara”. (e) Knowledge of real history
4. I think our (educated Hindus) duty; must be, to educate all Hindus, especially poor, irrespective of their cast and regionalism. We must support our religion and must vote en bloc to the party which is supporting/representing Hindu majority. If we do not do this, any party ruling India, other than party supporting / representing Hindus, will expedite Hindus being wiped out from this nation, and India will be a Muslim/Christen nation.
5. Therefore, it is our sacred, important and immediate duty (dharma) to educate all Hindus correctly and expeditiously. Surely we can do this. At least, I am doing this, in my humble way.
--- Dr VS Karnik (PhD in Management)
From: bk email@example.com
Sent: August 6, 2016
In this country (UK), HOLOCAST MEMORIAL is held every year and with serious commitment that it should never ever be forgotten.
We celebrate Dussehra every year, which actually mean Victory of Good over Evil.
Gandhi and Nehru are no less than evil and firm instrument for the vivisection of the mother land.
Till today there is no Memorial to the victims of the Partition;
the uprooted, humiliated and deprived of the dignity of their elders, and the Matra Shakti.
To add further injury to insult, these scoundrels have been glorified and glorified in our books and by naming all important Events, Buildings
in their memory.
Nehru's Education Minister, Maulana Azad, and Culture Minister, Humayn Kabir did their best to avoid partition and how it emerged from the School Text Books.
Our Countrymen should know the truth about them.
From: Jaffer Kassam
भारत का नया राष्ट्रगीत
New National Song of India
sharing as received
आओ बच्चों तुम्हे दिखायें,
शैतानी शैतान की।
नेताओं से बहुत दुखी है,
जनता हिन्दुस्तान की।।
बड़े-बड़े नेता शामिल हैं,
घोटालों की थाली में।
सूटकेश भर के चलते हैं,
अपने यहाँ दलाली में।।
देश-धर्म की नहीं है चिंता,
चिन्ता निज सन्तान की।
नेताओं से बहुत दुखी है,
जनता हिन्दुस्तान की।।
चोर-लुटेरे भी अब देखो,
सांसद और विधायक हैं।
सुरा-सुन्दरी के प्रेमी ये,
सचमुच के खलनायक हैं।।
भिखमंगों में गिनती कर दी,
भारत देश महान की।
नेताओं से बहुत दुखी है,
जनता हिन्दुस्तान की।।
जनता के आवंटित धन को,
आधा मन्त्री खाते हैं।
बाकी में अफसर-ठेकेदार,
मिलकर मौज उड़ाते हैं।।
लूट-खसोट मचा रखी है,
सरकारी अनुदान की।
नेताओं से बहुत दुखी है,
जनता हिन्दुस्तान की।।
थर्ड क्लास अफसर बन जाता,
फर्स्ट क्लास चपरासी है।
होशियार बच्चों के मन में,
छायी आज उदासी है।।
गंवार सारे मंत्री बन गये,
मेधावी आज खलासी है।
आओ बच्चों तुम्हें दिखायें,
शैतानी शैतान की।।
नेताओं से बहुत दुखी है,.
जनता हिन्दुस्तान की।
Kanwar Jit Singh, Hitech Machines, A-17, Vishnu Garden, New Delhi-110018, India
www.hitechindia.com, Mobile: 09891090790, Skype: hitechkj