WHY IS DYNASTY ANTI INDIA?

Date: 05/01/2019

THE DYNASTY IS NOT HINDU - THAT IS THE REASON, WHY THE
THE DYNASTY IS ANTI-HINDU AND, OF COURSE, ANTI-INDIA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MATHAI, PA TO NEHRU ONCE WROTE THAT NEHRU KEPT INDIA FOR HIMSELF, GAVE PAKISTAN TO HIS HALF-BROTHER JINNAH, AND GAVE KASHMIR TO ANOTHER OF HIS HALF BROTHER, SHAIK ABDULLAH

NO KASHMIR POLITICIAN HAD SPOKEN ILL OF DYNASTY - WHY ? BECAUSE THE DYNASTY WAS NOT A HINDU? HOW THE PANDITS WERE TREATED BY THE MUSLIMS OF KASHMIR? WHY NO DERAGATORY REFERENCE TO DYNASTY.?

BUT NOBDOY KNOWS THE TRUTH. PERHAPS, IF THE POST-MORTEM REPORTS

OF NEHRU KHAN, RAJIV KHAN, MAIMUNA BEGUM AND SANJAY KHAN, ARE STUDIED, PERHAPS SOME HEADWAY CAN BE MADE (CIRCUMCISION - WHETHER TAKEN PLACE). why BABUR BECKONS THE DYNASTY

I APPEND BELOW AN EXCE LLENT POSTING FROM ANOTHER GROUP, INDICATING THAT THE DYNASTY IS NOT HINDU.

OUR MEDIA WILL NOR TOUCH THIS SUBJECT - SICKULARISM


=================
000000000