Date: 28/09/2019

Congratulations to Shri Kulkarni for the excellent reply to the Article published in Pakistan on Kashmir issue. He has explained it all very well.

The bottom line is that UNO, that champions secularism and democracy, cannot approve of expansion on earth of (fundamentalist) ISLAM that is separatist, intolerant and violent.

Islamic Constitutions fly in the face of UN's Human Rights and Human Equality's Charter that also makes women equal to men in Law. This is most certainly NOT the case where a Constitution tolerates FOUR WIVES and the wedding of child brides- and divorce by uttering "talaq" three times!

Thus Pakistan herself is an ILLEGAL State according to UN's basic doctrine ("Grundgesetz"). Her Islamic Constitution is more suitable for the wild and violent Arab tribes of 7th Century AD rather than 21st century modern progressive world where Jews & Arabs, Christians and Buddhists, Hindus and Muslims ought to live (are required to live) together in harmony- and as equals, in every country on earth!

UN will also like to ask, "How have the Muslims in Kashmir Valley treated their HINDU fellow citizens in the last seven decades?" And what about PAKISTAN itself? Where have those happy Hindu (& Sikh) families of Lahore gone who had lived there for MILLENNIA?

The honourable thing that the UNO can do is to pass a Resolution immediately, demanding the DISSOLUTION of ISLAMIC Pakistan itself, and the county's merger with secular and tolerant BHARAT (Mother India). The historic frontiers of 1947, violated without sanity, reason or Referendum, ought to be RESTORED. All of India (in the frontiers of 1947) ought to live under ONE Constitution that is more like those in the UNITED States and the UNITED Kingdom rather than the one in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan!

It's a pity that the Muslims enjoying peace and safety- and equality, in Bharat are not raising their voices against the mischievous birth of Pakistan that separated the ones in Delhi from those in Karachi and Dhaka, forcing millions to flee, sowing the seeds of future unrest & fights- for ever.

There can be no peace until the volatile restless Muslims in Dhaka, Delhi and Dera Ghazi Khan live in ONE country and under ONE Constitution.

Secular, tolerant and CIVILISED India poses the biggest challenge for the UNO: "Please put the JINN back in bottle!"

28 Sep 2019

From: s. kulkarni

Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 11:43 AM
Reply to Article in the Friday Times of Pakistan on Kashmir issue.

My comments on the article published in 'The Friday Times,
Pakistan dt. 27-Sept-2019, on Kashmir, issue will be of
interest to many.

Fw: https://www.thefridaytimes.com/muddling-through/?unapproved=17913&moderation-hash=3b136971629750bc1d0687b6d20f017a#comment-17913

Pakistanis forget 4 points while discussing Kashmir-

(1) India is not an occupying force, which can be ejected from the area by throwing stones or so-called aspirations of people who are directly in conflict with the aspirations of over a billion people. If people's aspirations cannot be suppressed by force, they won't be suppressed by throwing stones or making noise by UN or human rights groups with a dubious record in other parts of the world, either. Hindus have been living in Kashmir for thousands of years and any alien ideology imported from the desert cannot lay claim on this area in the name of human rights. Did Pakistan support the Israeli occupation of Palestine on the same grounds?

(2) If 180 million Muslims can live in peace and prosperity enjoying equal rights in the rest of India, it should be good for 9 million Kashmiri Muslims too. There is nothing more Kashmiris can hope to get either in Pakistan or as an independent nation, which they are not getting presently in a democratic India.

(3) If India is not supposed to change status in Kashmir as it is a UN listed disputed territory, how come Pakistan changed status of Gilgit Baltistan and how it handed over part of it to China? If it was kosher then for Pakistan, it is OK for India.

(4) If Kashmir is unfinished agenda of partition of India on the religious ground, then a total exchange of population is unfinished agenda for Hindus. Can Pakistan afford to take 180 million Indian Muslims?
Muslims cannot eat their cake and have it too. They cannot get their
separate homeland and claim equal rights in the rest of India too. They
have to forget Kashmir or be ready to take all the Muslims with them.

Every government in New Delhi knows that the solution will not remain confined to only Kashmir and there will be serious consequences for Muslims in the rest of India. The question is whether they want to respect aspirations of 9 million Kashmiri Muslims and endanger the welfare and safety of 180 million Muslims spread all over India. Common sense tells you what will be the policy choice for New Delhi. No world community or UN can pressurise India where its very survival is at stake. Can the UN take guarantee for the safety of 180 million Muslims and ensure their safe passage to Pakistan? It will be another colossal humanitarian tragedy at hand, which the UN is ill-equipped to handle given their past record.

Given the cost-benefit ratio, we have to opt for the lesser evil and crush Kashmiri movement with an iron fist on humanitarian grounds, as the alternative scenario is equal to nuclear holocaust. It is time for Kashmiris
and Pakistan to forget Kashmir and move on. Or commit political, economic, military suicide. If Pakistan sticks out its neck to please the 'ghairat Brigade' or comedians calling for Gazwa-E-Hind, the jugular vein will be slit. Threatening nuclear war every now and then will be counter-productive and the world community will bankrupt Pakistan and cap, roll back and confiscate its Nuke capability and dismantle the nation, having
only nuisance value, into 4 pieces. The Choice is of Pakistan on which
path they want to tread.