Date: 10/03/2022
WAS IT PARTITION OR SURRENDER?
Definitions of the words
PARTITION: Division into two or more parts, especially of a country.
Terms of partition are negotiated freely by both parties, and mutual consensus is arrived at, before partition is accomplished. One would add that Partition is peaceful and mutually decided, or agreed upon. Both parties are satisfied and no repercussions or recriminations* follow. (*Recrimination: an act of quarrelling or blaming one another.) After Partition, if done fairly, no ill feelings remain. Both sides are satisfied.
SURRENDER: To yield to the power of especially an enemy as a sign of defeat.
Surrender, on the other hand, is forced by the victorious (stronger) side upon the defeated (weaker) side, by violence, or the threat of violence, coercion, blackmail, bullying, fraud or deception.
After surrender the losers are left bitter and humiliated. They resolve, consciously or unconsciously, to retaliate to recover the territory, or “pay back in the same coin”, or in some other way.
Surrender creates enemies for ever. The humiliated side remains resentful and bitter, and wishes to redeem their pride and honour.
Dear patriots, YOU decide whether what took place, or what was done to our (Mother) India in 1947, was Partition or Surrender.
I submit that it was the most ignominious and humiliating unconditional surrender of the entire human history that was FORCED upon the mute Hindu majority, following the threat of civil war or bloodshed by the leader of All-India Muslim League, Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
It was done without Referendum, without charging any price and without safeguards for the Hindu/Sikh minority that was trapped under the hostile ISLAMIC Constitution that divided the population into “MOMINS and KAFIRS”, making the Hindus and Sikhs second rate citizens under the Sharia Law.
I submit that the SURRENDER was made to look a normal event to both Hindus and Muslims in order to “save the skin” of Jinnah, who dictated the terms, and Gandhi and Nehru, who meekly submitted to the terms of the unconditional surrender without protest or boycott of the talks.
I submit that both Messrs. Gandhi and Nehru “sold” their conscience in order to appease Mr. Jinnah by surrendering Hindusthan (India) without due deliberation or deep thought about the implications and consequences of the vast territorial surrenders.
I submit that both Gandhi and Nehru washed their hands off any guilt or responsibility after the surrender by calling it “Partition”, and did not reach out to the millions of trapped Hindus and Sikhs who were fleeing in utmost panic and terror, having lost all possessions and many members of their families to the killers, abductors, looters and the rapists.
I submit that both Gandhi and Nehru not only betrayed their country of birth but also their cherished principle of Secularism by accepting supremacy of Islam in the hastily surrendered provinces.
I earnestly demand that the so-called “PARTITION of INDIA” ought to be discussed in public and then those who betrayed their COUNTRY, PEOPLE AND SECULARISM declared national TRAITORS and CRIMINALS in order to set the record straight for posterity.
If this is not done, then we all, who regard ourselves Bharatiya or Indian, are accomplices in that High Treason by Messrs JINNAH, GANDHI and NEHRU who agreed to the unconditional SURRENDER of India on August 15, 1947.
.
========================
000000000